Legal Regulation of the Status of Subjects of Special Competence in Relation to Public Administration in the Sphere of Intellectual Property in Ukraine

Leheza, Yevhen; Deliya, Yuriy; Ryzhkov, Eduard; Albul, Serhii; Shamara, Oleksandr

doi:10.15408/jch.v9i2.22234

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In turn, civil legal constructions extend to the traditional sphere of public law, which is a process of "civilization" of public relations. In public law, coordination methods are sometimes used in relations between state authorities, contractual relations begin to be applied not only in international public law, but also in the national law of Ukraine (Leheza et al, 2021).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Private Law and Public Law relation: dualism of Law branchesin society

Mudrytska

Panova

Melnik

et al. 2022

RDLUZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research. The article is concerned with researching relations between private and public law in Ukraine.Main content. The historical aspect of this problem and the substantiation of its current relevance for Ukraine are analyzed. Methodology: Review of materials and methods on the basis of analyzing documentary materials concerning problems of mutual relation and interdependence of private and public law. Conclusions. The optimal balance of private and public interests can be achieved by considering the problem of mutual relation and interdependence of private and public law in a dualistic aspect. Opposition of public and private interests in state regulation by legal means is unacceptable, since it is through streamlining the public-legal regulation of public-legal relations that it is possibleto achieve an optimal ratio of public and private interests.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Private Law and Public Law relation: dualism of Law branchesin society

Mudrytska

Panova

Melnik

et al. 2022

RDLUZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Military occupation, which occurs outside the state of war, includes occupatio pacifica or occupation upon consent. The term "pacific" does not mean that occupation is "peaceful" in the usual meaning of the word, or that it is executed without the use of force; this term means only that from the legal point of view such occupation is carried out outside the context of the formal state of war, in accordance with the terms of an agreement, invitation or consent of the occupied state for occupation, within the limits of humanitarian intervention, occupation of the failed state or actual military occupation of a territory with uncertain status (LEHEZA et al, 2021).…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the international law does not presuppose legal transfer of sovereign rights to an aggressor through annexation Nevertheless, the practice of the Second World War and even that of the period following it, up to the latest events in Ukraine, gives only ambiguous signals about reaction of international law to the situation when an illegal annexation was performed and the situation stabilized (this is especially true with regard to the Israeli occupation of the Golan Heights or the Russian occupation of Crimea). This clash between the norms of international law, not backed by an adequate system of preventive and reactive measures, and reality, has given rise to the Russia's impunity for its actions in Crimea, and today this impunity has escalated into a full-scale war (LEHEZA et al, 2021).…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal status of the territory of Crimea after the accession of Russia

Leheza¹,

Pryimachenko²,

Moroz³

et al. 2022

R. Curso Dir UNIFOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research. The purpose of the article consists in determination of the current international legal regime of the territory of Crimea for further proper argumentation of Ukraine’s position in interstate disputes with the Russian Federation. Main content. Various forms of foreign military presence on the territory of a state have been studied, such as: occupation, conquest, deployment of foreign military bases, annexation, etc. Determined are signs that characterize the legal regimes of occupation and annexation and their international regulation. Methodology: Review of materials and methods based on analysis of documentary materials of the annexation of Crimea on the part of Russia. Conclusions. Characteristic features of annexation being currently a kind of aggression crime include unilateral declaration of state sovereignty over a territory which have not been a part of this state, as well as the legitimation of annexation through de facto ownership of a territory and international recognition of this fact. According to the international law, there is currently no legal mechanism for the transfer of sovereignty over territory to an aggressor through annexation. Key words: annexation, conquest, foreign military presence, occupation, sovereignty.

show abstract

Illegal influence on the results of sports competitions: comparison with foreign legislation

Leheza

2022

Ratio Juris

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the research is devoted to the criminological description and explanation of the state of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions in Ukraine. Main content. An ultra-high level of latency of crimes according to Art. 369-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is found, which is at least 99% of their actual level. The structure of match-fixing (Falsify the results) was revealed and analyzed depending on the type of sport, the method of illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions, as well as the subjects of bribery. The characteristic of the corresponding structural units is given. Methodology: Materials and methods research based on the analysis of documentary sources. the basis is the dialectical method of cognition of the facts of social reality, on which the formal legal and comparative legal approaches are largely based. Conclusions. The most intense criminal match-fixing is practiced in such kinds of sports as football, futsal, basketball and volleyball. Among the ways to encourage athletes to commit illegal acts, bribery predominates (75%). Approximately at the same level in terms of prevalence with small fluctuations in specific weight are structurally located such ways of influencing athletes as incitement (10%), conspiracy (8%) and coercion (7%). In general, illegal influence on the results of official sports competitions on bribery is directed directly at athletes. In total, the share of such influence is 78% with a slight predominance of bribery of several athletes (players) of one team (40%) over bribery of an individual player (38%). In second place in terms of ranking - bribery of members of the coaching staff (10%). Then bribery of judges (5%), owners of sports clubs (5%), support staff of clubs (2%).

show abstract

Legal Regulation of the Status of Subjects of Special Competence in Relation to Public Administration in the Sphere of Intellectual Property in Ukraine

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Private Law and Public Law relation: dualism of Law branchesin society

Private Law and Public Law relation: dualism of Law branchesin society

Legal status of the territory of Crimea after the accession of Russia

Illegal influence on the results of sports competitions: comparison with foreign legislation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About