Legal Pluralism and Development 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139094597.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal Pluralism and Development Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taubman (2005, 526) defines such a framework as being "an heterogeneous network of mutual recognition that does not confine [traditional knowledge] to one distinct genus, but recognizes that divergent knowledge traditions, integrated with customary law, warrant recognition as distinct genera, under the aegis of a general set of core principles." Although at present the amorphous nature of customary law appears to present significant obstacles to the adoption of such a framework, insights from the developments occurring in the field of non-state justice systems generally (International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2009;Albrecht and Kyed, 2010;Sage et al, 2011), and from successful traditional knowledge initiatives based on customary law worldwide (Recht, 2009, p.242; International Institute for the Environment and Development, Nijar, 2010, p. 473) are sure to offer many solutions. 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taubman (2005, 526) defines such a framework as being "an heterogeneous network of mutual recognition that does not confine [traditional knowledge] to one distinct genus, but recognizes that divergent knowledge traditions, integrated with customary law, warrant recognition as distinct genera, under the aegis of a general set of core principles." Although at present the amorphous nature of customary law appears to present significant obstacles to the adoption of such a framework, insights from the developments occurring in the field of non-state justice systems generally (International Council on Human Rights Policy, 2009;Albrecht and Kyed, 2010;Sage et al, 2011), and from successful traditional knowledge initiatives based on customary law worldwide (Recht, 2009, p.242; International Institute for the Environment and Development, Nijar, 2010, p. 473) are sure to offer many solutions. 24…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory space is an analytical construct that challenges hierarchical notions of regulation and draws attention away from the state as the sole source of regulatory authority (Hancher and Moran, 1998: 271; Scott, 2001). The spatial image is key to this approach (Hancher and Moran, 1998: 153–154).…”
Section: Regulatory Pluralism In Collective Labour Dispute Resolution...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial image is key to this approach (Hancher and Moran, 1998: 153–154). Within any given regulatory space, regulatory power is dispersed and fragmented between various state and private actors (Scott, 2001: 2). The boundaries of the space, and the relative power of actors within it, are subject to contestation and negotiation between actors.…”
Section: Regulatory Pluralism In Collective Labour Dispute Resolution...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a long time, legal scholars insisted on separating out the state legal system as a final arbiter of other institutions' authority. The state legal system, in other words, serves as a centralized metainstitution that determines jurisdiction for all state and nonstate institutions under it (Sage and Woolcock 2012). This view is giving way to a more relational approach (e.g., Eisenberg 2019).…”
Section: Traditional Versus Commercial Khat Producing Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%