2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal constraints in EU product labelling to mitigate the environmental risk of veterinary medicines at use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicted environmental concentration (PEC) calculations using exposure models suggest that in surface water, concentrations of 25 up to 60 ng/l can be reached (Montforts et al 2004; Sanderson et al 2007). Based on our study, an overall NOEC of 30 ng/l is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted environmental concentration (PEC) calculations using exposure models suggest that in surface water, concentrations of 25 up to 60 ng/l can be reached (Montforts et al 2004; Sanderson et al 2007). Based on our study, an overall NOEC of 30 ng/l is suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the extent of use of veterinary medicines is not generally available in the public domain for countries in the EU (Kools, Moltmann, & Knacker, 2008). Montforts, Van Rijswick, and De Haes (2004) stated that it is imperative that the risk assessment methodology for veterinary medicines is further developed and correctly applied. The European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (EMEA, 2009) identified the need for validated, standardised methods for assessing the fate of veterinary medicines in manure at either laboratory or field level.…”
Section: Veterinary Medicinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not, then realistic best case conditions, characterising a possible safe use in vulnerable areas under the Nitrate Directive in the European Union, are proposed in a similar scenario, now assuming active incorporation of slurry into 20 cm of soil, at a nitrogen application rate of 170 kg N ha −1 year −1 in one time. If the trigger for further testing is exceeded, then further assessments should be made at the member state level, since environmental concerns can be a reason to refuse (mutual recognition of) marketing authorisation (Montforts et al, 2004).…”
Section: Scenario Development For Spreading Of Manurementioning
confidence: 99%