2018
DOI: 10.2471/blt.18.213777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal capacities required for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases

Abstract: Law lies at the centre of successful national strategies for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. By law we mean international agreements, national and subnational legislation, regulations and other executive instruments, and decisions of courts and tribunals. However, the vital role of law in global health development is often poorly understood, and eclipsed by other disciplines such as medicine, public health and economics. This paper identifies key areas of intersection between law and noncom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulatory and legislative action is required for the introduction and enforcement of new rules around tobacco and alcohol production, marketing, distribution, and use. Industry engagement is needed for widespread changes to food content, and the participation of municipalities and institutions is necessary to introduce improvements to road-and walkways [27,28]. More than a simple coordination problem, many of the regulations face active opposition from the tobacco, alcohol, and food industries, whose economic interests are threatened [29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory and legislative action is required for the introduction and enforcement of new rules around tobacco and alcohol production, marketing, distribution, and use. Industry engagement is needed for widespread changes to food content, and the participation of municipalities and institutions is necessary to introduce improvements to road-and walkways [27,28]. More than a simple coordination problem, many of the regulations face active opposition from the tobacco, alcohol, and food industries, whose economic interests are threatened [29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tangcharoensathien and colleagues describe key tactics used by “Big” Food, Tobacco, and Alcohol to weaken or forestall NCD prevention measures, including litigating against strong public health interventions, using front groups to counter public health recommendations, funding and influencing research favourable to industry interests, and gaining preferential access to policy-making processes by building relationships with health leaders and legislators. 4 Industry uses a range of other tools to influence policies harmful to its economic interests, including pre-emption of state, provincial, or local laws to prevent NCDs; adopting self-regulation or voluntary measures to stave off stronger statutory regulation 9,10 ; and shaping public dialogue on NCD causation, promoting discourses of individual choice, personal responsibility, and the “Nanny State,” while resisting science-based interventions that facilitate shared responsibility and government action on NCDs. 11 In addition, industry actors tend to set their own targets or metrics for what they are willing to achieve in NCD prevention, rather than adopting more stringent best-practice targets recommended by national governments or the World Health Organization (WHO).…”
Section: Industry Influence On Ncd Law and Policy-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Equally important are comprehensive national prevention strategies, including legal, regulatory, and fiscal capacities such as taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (now introduced in over 40 countries worldwide), 6 excise taxes to discourage alcohol purchasing and consumption, and mandatory warning labels on cigarette packets, alcoholic beverages, and unhealthy foods and drinks, with some countries currently exploring graphic warning labels for sugary beverages. 7-9 Tangcharoensathien and colleagues aptly describe a major challenge faced by LMICs in robustly regulating multinational corporations, namely industry’s undue influence on law and policy-making. 4 The authors in this commentary discuss strategies for ameliorating industry interference and conflicts of interest in the design and implementation of NCD prevention measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, States and the donor community should invest in relevant legal capacity building including legal literacy on international human rights law and implications for the obesity response and provide resources for civil society empowerment to advocate for greater State action to address obesity . These recommendations are summarized in [Box ].…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%