2020
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legacy effects override soil properties for CO2 and N2O but not CH4 emissions following digestate application to soil

Abstract: The application of organic materials to soil can recycle nutrients and increase organic matter in agricultural lands. Digestate can be used as a nutrient source for crop production but it has also been shown to stimulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from amended soils. While edaphic factors, such as soil texture and pH, have been shown to be strong determinants of soil GHG fluxes, the impact of the legacy of previous management practices is less well understood. Here we aim to investigate the impact of such … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can indicate that the current manure-EF in the Canadian inventory might be underestimated. This inference is further supported by reports of legacy effects on N 2 O emissions from elds amended with manure (Pearce, 2017; Thilakarathna and Hernandez-Ramirez, 2021) or digestate applications (Rosace et al, 2020). Thus, to clarify these uncertainties, our study undertook the quanti cation of N 2 O emissions during a second year of manure injections and also the subsequent spring thaw following the cessation of manure injections.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This can indicate that the current manure-EF in the Canadian inventory might be underestimated. This inference is further supported by reports of legacy effects on N 2 O emissions from elds amended with manure (Pearce, 2017; Thilakarathna and Hernandez-Ramirez, 2021) or digestate applications (Rosace et al, 2020). Thus, to clarify these uncertainties, our study undertook the quanti cation of N 2 O emissions during a second year of manure injections and also the subsequent spring thaw following the cessation of manure injections.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, in both years, significant differences among digestates were noted on several sampling dates, for N 2 O as well as 15 N-N 2 O fluxes (e.g., flux rates from M digestate vs. fluxes from SB digestate in Figure 2 and Supplementary Tables 1-3 (Abubaker et al, 2013). Therefore, N 2 O emissions discussed in this study might differ on soils with different soil textures or amendment history (Rosace et al, 2020). In this context, soil texture, soil amendment history and fertility status, especially OM content, plays a crucial role, exceeding the effect of digestate properties.…”
Section: N 2 O Emissions Affected By Fertilizer Typementioning
confidence: 75%
“…This substantial difference is due to the fact that they used a broadcast application without incorporation into the soil. On the contrary, Rosace et al [44] measured, in their experiment, approximately more than six times lower carbon dioxide fluxes in a comparable measurement period straight after the digestate application. This difference in values may have been caused by a different measurement method (laboratory analysis) and by the different physical properties of soils, especially their texture, which influences the rate of escape of emissions into the atmosphere [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%