2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2017.8324814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leg design for running and jumping dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of a symmetric five-bar linkage, Kenneally and Koditschek [37] measured performance according to the conversion of battery energy into body energy, the minimization of touchdown losses, and the storing/return of energy during stance. Blackman et al [38] extended their analysis, highlighting the ability of this symmetric five-bar to achieve greater speeds and stability in one configuration, but greater jump height in another. Brown et al [39] analyzed the ability of this five-bar and other linkage designs to balance workloads between motors.…”
Section: B Design Principles For Legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the analysis of a symmetric five-bar linkage, Kenneally and Koditschek [37] measured performance according to the conversion of battery energy into body energy, the minimization of touchdown losses, and the storing/return of energy during stance. Blackman et al [38] extended their analysis, highlighting the ability of this symmetric five-bar to achieve greater speeds and stability in one configuration, but greater jump height in another. Brown et al [39] analyzed the ability of this five-bar and other linkage designs to balance workloads between motors.…”
Section: B Design Principles For Legged Robotsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each leg was controlled by two BLDC motors that actuated the legs as seen in figure 2. These low-profile outrunner motors (Quanum 5250, DYS motors) are common in recent small to mid-size legged robots [54][55][56][57][58][59]. Motor current control for the two motors were performed by a single ODrive motor controller (ODrive Robotics, Richmond, CA), which performed commutation at 10 kHz.…”
Section: Leg Design and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, proprioceptive-based methods rely on actuator and transmission systems that have low gear-ratios, low friction, and high backdrivability [52,53]. Direct-drive actuation achieves all of these qualities and is increasingly prevalent in the regime of medium-small legged robots [39,[54][55][56][57][58][59]. The lowgear ratio motors provide tight control over the forces that legs impart on the ground enabling impressive dynamic robots [60].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights of the cited small-sized platforms range from 1.1 g [24] to 1.3 kg [26]. Generally, legged robots heavier than 1.3 kg combine power modulation and cyclic appendage trajectories with multiple actuators [34]- [37]. The increased number of actuators increases power output and degrees of freedom, but it also increases the weight of the platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%