2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leg and lower limb dynamic joint stiffness during different walking speeds in healthy adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, walking speed affects elements of walking kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity. The muscle activity is an important mechanism that is required for walking stability, especially at different walking speeds [1]. Hof et al (2002) examined electromyographic (EMG) patterns at a variety of speeds and found considerable changes with speed [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, walking speed affects elements of walking kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity. The muscle activity is an important mechanism that is required for walking stability, especially at different walking speeds [1]. Hof et al (2002) examined electromyographic (EMG) patterns at a variety of speeds and found considerable changes with speed [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…between rigid-bodies of the shank and rearfoot, with a three-segment foot defined as per the IOR model [ 32 ]. Defining the ankle joint in this way has been shown to provide improved estimation of joint angle changes [ 33 ], which has important implications for the ankle torque–angle relationship, especially compared with previous research that used a single rigid foot segment [ 12 , 19 , 34 , 35 ]. Neutral ankle angle (0°) was defined as the ankle position during quiet standing with plantar flexion defined as positive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the maximum kneeflexion angle in the shock absorption should be limited to ∆θ max . Abdel et al [24] suggested that ∆θ max should not exceed about 22 • . Finally, to avoid oscillation, the motion of the shockabsorption process should be unidirectional.…”
Section: Optimized Knee-trajectory Modulation 211 Optimized Shock-abs...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although set-A (A1 and A2, with lower F pre and k) contributes to the reduction in the PGRF, it leads to excessive knee flexion angles, (as shown in Figure 7c,d, which may cause the opposite foot to scuff the ground during swings. According to the experience of clinical trials, the variation in knee flexion during shock absorption should not exceed about 22 • [24].…”
Section: Simulation Of the Oktmmentioning
confidence: 99%