1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.1985.tb01246.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Ventricular Volume Reduction: New Dawn or False Horizon? Basic Science and Clinical Doubts

Abstract: Left ventricular volume reduction surgery (LVVR) for end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy is a surgical option used selectively but with unclear long-term results. Increasing numbers of reports are appearing in the literature. These should be pooled into an international registry through collaborative efforts that allow for more effective analysis. Furthermore, high priority must be given to identify subgroups of patients who will potentially gain most benefit from LVVR. Basic science may add invaluable data and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While certain echocardiographic criteria such as preoperative endsystolic wall stress may be helpful, more promising means of selection may have to be directed towards evaluation at the cellular level. [9][10][11] Operative technique, which has not yet been standardized, seems to play a key role in the success of this procedure. Theoretically, extensive resections are more likely to attain the objectives of the operation but they are associated with higher mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While certain echocardiographic criteria such as preoperative endsystolic wall stress may be helpful, more promising means of selection may have to be directed towards evaluation at the cellular level. [9][10][11] Operative technique, which has not yet been standardized, seems to play a key role in the success of this procedure. Theoretically, extensive resections are more likely to attain the objectives of the operation but they are associated with higher mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%