2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Ventricular Strain in Chemotherapy-Naive and Radiotherapy-Naive Patients With Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tadic et al have recently published their research findings of abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function in 122 chemotherapy naïve and radiotherapy naïve cancer patients (prechemotherapy) and 45 age‐matched controls. They reported significant abnormality in LV systolic function in cancer patients compared to controls and reported a decrease in LV global longitudinal strain, (19.1 ± 2.1% vs 17.8 ± 3.5%, P ‐ .022), LV global circumferential strain, (22.9 ± 3.5% vs 20.1 ± 4.1%, P < .001), and LV global radial strain, (40.5 ± 8.8% vs 35.2 ± 10.7%; P ‐ .004) . These finding are similar to findings in our study population where we have found significant abnormalities LV systolic function as assessed by speckle strain imaging in prechemotherapy group compared to normal group.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Tadic et al have recently published their research findings of abnormal left ventricular (LV) systolic function in 122 chemotherapy naïve and radiotherapy naïve cancer patients (prechemotherapy) and 45 age‐matched controls. They reported significant abnormality in LV systolic function in cancer patients compared to controls and reported a decrease in LV global longitudinal strain, (19.1 ± 2.1% vs 17.8 ± 3.5%, P ‐ .022), LV global circumferential strain, (22.9 ± 3.5% vs 20.1 ± 4.1%, P < .001), and LV global radial strain, (40.5 ± 8.8% vs 35.2 ± 10.7%; P ‐ .004) . These finding are similar to findings in our study population where we have found significant abnormalities LV systolic function as assessed by speckle strain imaging in prechemotherapy group compared to normal group.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In accordance with the results of this study, Pavo et al (22) found that myocardial damage was directly linked to cancer, and myocardial damage biomarkers were upregulated in cancer patients who did not undergo cardiotoxic therapies. Likewise, a retrospective study revealed that cancer patients without CT or RT had a higher risk of cardiac dysfunction than the age-and gender-matched controls (12). However, these studies were limited due to small sample size, whereas this study included large-scale and multicenter cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A single-center study supported this possibility and found decreased cardiac function among cancer patients not exposed to CT or RT. (12) Another study also revealed that tumors could directly induce cardiovascular damage by tumor-induced in ammation in tumor-bearing mice (13). The cardiotoxicity of CT and RT in breast cancer patients is con rmed, but it remains elusive whether avoiding CT and/or RT regimens lower or increase CVD risk in breast cancer survivors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LV circumferential and radial strains were not assessed in this study. 4,5 The difference existed not only in the global values of LV and RV strains, but also in layer-specific strain, which further implies transmural myocardial and not endocardial impairment, as it was usually presumed. Mavinkurve-Groothuis et al reported a significant reduction in LV longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains in the children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after anthracycline therapy than before treatment.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Dysfunction Before Chemotherapy: Did We Mismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 Our research group recently published studies in which it was shown not only that LV multidirectional strain (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) was significantly decreased in chemotherapy-and radiotherapy-naïve patients with solid cancer, but also that right ventricular (RV) longitudinal strain was significantly reduced in the cancer patients in comparison with controls. 4,5 The difference existed not only in the global values of LV and RV strains, but also in layer-specific strain, which further implies transmural myocardial and not endocardial impairment, as it was usually presumed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%