2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ventricular MRI wall motion assessment by monogenic signal amplitude image computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the commonly used technique for the assessment of left ventricular function [6]. Additionally, non-invasive cardiac CT is also established to characterize left ventricular function in terms of global strain [7] or reginal wall motion stress [3,8] as well as to increase transcatheter aortic valve implantation [9][10][11][12][13] and to simplify stent positioning on severe coronary artery disease [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the commonly used technique for the assessment of left ventricular function [6]. Additionally, non-invasive cardiac CT is also established to characterize left ventricular function in terms of global strain [7] or reginal wall motion stress [3,8] as well as to increase transcatheter aortic valve implantation [9][10][11][12][13] and to simplify stent positioning on severe coronary artery disease [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 2D generalization is known as the monogenic signal [27]. The monogenic signal tool allows the computation of local features from the image such as the local amplitude that represents the energy, image structural information that usually defined by local phase, and the orientation that informs about the dominant direction in an image [28]. The monogenic signal is defined as [29]:…”
Section: Parametric Imaging Methods From the Monogenic Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theoretical background on this operator is described in the following. The monogenic signal and the monogenic curvature tensor.According to [25], we can define an intrinsic dimension that expresses the number of degrees of freedom necessary to describe the local structure. The MonoGenic signal (MG) corresponds to the effective instrument for analyzing 1D and 2D signals in case of invariable rotation.…”
Section: The Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…\right.} \end{array} \end{equation}The MG is presented as a fusion of the image Ifalse(αfalse)$I(\alpha )$, and its Riesz transform: I(α)M=false(I(α),RKx{I}(α),RKy{I}(α)false)=(I,RKxI,RKyI),\begin{equation} \def\eqcellsep{&}\begin{array}{ccc}I(\alpha )_{M}= (I(\alpha ),RK_{x}\lbrace I\rbrace (\alpha ), RK_{y}\lbrace I\rbrace (\alpha )) \\[3pt] = (I,RK_{x}*I ,RK_{y}*I), \end{array} \end{equation}where * corresponds to the convolution operator.In [25] and [26], the local orientation is computed as follows: θbadbreak=arctanRKy{I}RKx{I},θ[0,π).\begin{equation} \theta = arctan \frac{RK_{y}\lbrace I\rbrace }{RK_{x}\lbrace I\rbrace }, \theta \in [0,\pi ). \end{equation}Moreover, for any intrinsic 1D signal I(x), we can demonstrate that: truerightRKx2{I}(0,0),RKy2{I}(0,0)badbreak=|false(h1I(θ)false)false(0false)…”
Section: The Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation