2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(00)00079-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass by CMR was obtained from 3D delineation of endo/epicardial contours, whereas echo-derived mass was obtained using a 1D linear formula that incorporates assumptions regarding LV geometry. Prior studies have shown that volumetric mass by CMR yields lower values than does linear-derived mass by echo 29,30 and that magnitude of difference between modalities is greatest in patients with LV remodeling. 31 It is important to recognize that although LV filling profiles add to the information obtained from routine CMR exams, approximately one fourth of patients with echoevidenced diastolic dysfunction were not identified by CMR indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mass by CMR was obtained from 3D delineation of endo/epicardial contours, whereas echo-derived mass was obtained using a 1D linear formula that incorporates assumptions regarding LV geometry. Prior studies have shown that volumetric mass by CMR yields lower values than does linear-derived mass by echo 29,30 and that magnitude of difference between modalities is greatest in patients with LV remodeling. 31 It is important to recognize that although LV filling profiles add to the information obtained from routine CMR exams, approximately one fourth of patients with echoevidenced diastolic dysfunction were not identified by CMR indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for the anatomic and functional assessment of the heart [6][7][8][9]. Nevertheless, while its accuracy and reproducibility have been widely demonstrated for the LV measurements [10][11][12], few studies have assessed the in vivo validity and reproducibility of the RV dimensions and function using routine cine-MRI methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive assessments of blood flow and distensibility in the pulmonary arteries can be made [9][10][11], as well as estimates of stroke volume and cardiac output [10]. Changes in right ventricular mass (RVM), function and pulmonary artery blood flow have been observed following lung transplantation [12][13][14][15] and MRI has been shown to be far more accurate than ECHO in monitoring changes in left ventricular mass (LVM) [16].Several investigators have attempted to use MRI as a noninvasive means of estimating MPAP but none have reported any advantages over ECHO. Right ventricular end-diastolic wall thickness has been shown to correlate well with MPAP in primary Eur Respir J…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%