2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ventricular function after noninvasive cardiac ablation using proton beam therapy in a porcine model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the cell biological mechanisms and the temporal process of the effects of RA/CRS are poorly understood. For a single fraction dose of 25 Gy, the phenomenon of marked clinical effects in terms of reduction of VT burden or ICD interventions without the clear formation of a scar has been reported from preclinical data [34,36,38,39] and even from patients treatments [24,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Still, the cell biological mechanisms and the temporal process of the effects of RA/CRS are poorly understood. For a single fraction dose of 25 Gy, the phenomenon of marked clinical effects in terms of reduction of VT burden or ICD interventions without the clear formation of a scar has been reported from preclinical data [34,36,38,39] and even from patients treatments [24,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we added initial technical, pre-clinical, and clinical manuscripts not covered by the search based on our own experience in cardiac radiosurgery in the past 12 years. Evidence was finally extracted from the remaining 42 manuscripts, which include reports on two clinical trials [22,23], two clinical case series [24,25], eight case reports [19,20,[26][27][28][29][30][31], eight preclinical studies [18,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], fourteen technical studies [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], and eight reviews or opinions [7,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60].…”
Section: Clinical Trial and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations