2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.795321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left Ventricular Ejection Time Measured by Echocardiography Differentiates Neurobehavioral Resilience and Vulnerability to Sleep Loss and Stress

Abstract: There are substantial individual differences (resilience and vulnerability) in performance resulting from sleep loss and psychosocial stress, but predictive potential biomarkers remain elusive. Similarly, marked changes in the cardiovascular system from sleep loss and stress include an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. It remains unknown whether key hemodynamic markers, including left ventricular ejection time (LVET), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), blood pressure (BP), and sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(178 reference statements)
3
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, our prior study found that one night of TSD significantly increased LVET, SBP, and DBP but did not produce any significant alterations in CI or SVRI (Yamazaki, Rosendahl-Garcia, et al, 2022). Differences between the current study and our prior study (Yamazaki, Rosendahl-Garcia, et al, 2022) may be due to that study's shorter duration, single exposure to TSD, or different environmental study conditions, among other factors. Our results were consistent with some prior studies from other groups (Kato et al, 2000;Sunbul et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2005), but not others (Cernych et al, 2021;Kato et al, 2000;Krause et al, 2023;Kuetting et al, 2019;Mikulski et al, 2006;Papacocea et al, 2019;Sauvet et al, 2010;Sunbul et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, our prior study found that one night of TSD significantly increased LVET, SBP, and DBP but did not produce any significant alterations in CI or SVRI (Yamazaki, Rosendahl-Garcia, et al, 2022). Differences between the current study and our prior study (Yamazaki, Rosendahl-Garcia, et al, 2022) may be due to that study's shorter duration, single exposure to TSD, or different environmental study conditions, among other factors. Our results were consistent with some prior studies from other groups (Kato et al, 2000;Sunbul et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2005), but not others (Cernych et al, 2021;Kato et al, 2000;Krause et al, 2023;Kuetting et al, 2019;Mikulski et al, 2006;Papacocea et al, 2019;Sauvet et al, 2010;Sunbul et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The average value of three consecutive readings, taken one minute apart, was used for analyses. SVRI was calculated by assuming that central venous pressure was zero and by using the following equations (Klabunde, 2012; Norsk et al., 2015; Yamazaki, Rosendahl‐Garcia, et al., 2022):Mean arterial pressuregoodbreak=)(SBPgoodbreak+2*DBP/3$$ \mathrm{Mean}\ \mathrm{arterial}\ \mathrm{pressure}=\left(\mathrm{SBP}+{2}^{\ast}\mathrm{DBP}\right)/3 $$SVRIgoodbreak=mean arterial pressure/CI$$ \mathrm{SVRI}=\mathrm{mean}\ \mathrm{arterial}\ \mathrm{pressure}/\mathrm{CI} $$…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations