2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left ureteral appendiceal interposition: Exercise caution and do not be mislead by postoperative radiological obstruction

Abstract: Postoperative imaging after appendiceal ureteral interposition may be difficult to interpret, misguiding the urologist towards intervention. We present a case in which radiological obstruction was not endorsed by a 99TcDTPA nephrogram, with favorable outcome after conservative treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some case reports and case series reports (as shown in Table 2) of appendiceal interposition were reported during the past century, as some technical issues might limit the use of the appendix. [49][50][51][52][53] The appendix could be unavailable or unsuitable for ureteral reconstruction when it is absent because of previous appendectomy, or it became scarred or narrow as a result of previous inflammation. The length of the appendix is finite, replacing approximately 3-cm ureteral defects on average, and usually it fails to bridge long-segment strictures or a defect is left-sided.…”
Section: Appendiceal Interpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some case reports and case series reports (as shown in Table 2) of appendiceal interposition were reported during the past century, as some technical issues might limit the use of the appendix. [49][50][51][52][53] The appendix could be unavailable or unsuitable for ureteral reconstruction when it is absent because of previous appendectomy, or it became scarred or narrow as a result of previous inflammation. The length of the appendix is finite, replacing approximately 3-cm ureteral defects on average, and usually it fails to bridge long-segment strictures or a defect is left-sided.…”
Section: Appendiceal Interpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small luminal diameter of the appendix restricts the tendency to dilate with the passage of time, and together its intrinsic peristalsis leads to a minimal risk of urinary stasis and reflux. Some case reports and case series reports (as shown in Table 2) of appendiceal interposition were reported during the past century, as some technical issues might limit the use of the appendix . The appendix could be unavailable or unsuitable for ureteral reconstruction when it is absent because of previous appendectomy, or it became scarred or narrow as a result of previous inflammation.…”
Section: Appendiceal Interpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%