Left-turn phasing selection considering vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to pedestrian conflicts

Dey, Kakan; Rahman, Md Tawhidur; Das, Subasish; Williams, Amrit Manova

doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2021.07.006

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sharma et al devised a framework to determine the appropriate use of leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) for left turns [20], proposing a quantitative approach considering factors like pedestrian exposure, crash risk, and vehicle delay costs to balance safety and efficiency. In a recent study, Dey et al used simulations to estimate the effects of pedestrian presence on leftturn conflicts during permissive left-turn phasing involving vehicles [21], finding a higher occurrence of conflicts involving pedestrians, highlighting the importance of considering pedestrian volumes in left-turn phasing decisions. Yang et al evaluated an unconventional left-turn waiting area design downstream of the stop bar [22], using analytical queueing models to estimate capacity and delay and validated against empirical data.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of Analyzable Solutions for Left-Turn-Centered Congestion Problems in Urban Grid Networks

Ardalan,

Sarazhinsky,

Dobrota

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traffic congestion caused by left-turning vehicles in a coordinated corridor is a multifaceted problem requiring tailored solutions. This study explores the impact of shared left-turn lanes within one-way couplets, particularly during peak hours, where high left-turn volumes, limited side street storage, and the overlapped green time between pedestrians and left-turners contribute to queue spillbacks, coordination interruption, and network congestion. The focus of this paper is on the solutions that can be easily analyzed by practitioners, here called “analyzable solutions”. This approach stands in contrast to solutions derived from “non-transparent” optimization tools, which do not allow for a clear assessment of the solution’s adequacy or the ability to predict its impact in real-world applications. This paper investigates the effects of employing two analyzable signal timing strategies: Lagging Pedestrian (LagPed) phasing and Left-Turn Progression (LTP) offsets. Using high-fidelity microsimulation, the authors evaluated different scenarios, assessing pedestrian delays, queue lengths, travel time index, area average travel time index, and environmental impacts such as Fuel Consumption (FC) and CO2 emissions. The effectiveness of the proposed strategies was comprehensively evaluated against the base case scenario, demonstrating considerable improvements in various performance measures, including approximately a 5% reduction in FC and CO2 emissions. Implementation of the LTP strategy alone yields substantial reductions in delays, the number of stops, the queue length for left-turning vehicles, travel times for all road users, and ultimately FC and CO2 emissions. This study offers innovative approach to addressing the complex and multifaceted problem of left-turn-centered congestion in urban grid networks using efficient and down-to-earth analyzable solutions.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%