2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86474-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left posterior temporal cortex is sensitive to syntax within conceptually matched Arabic expressions

Abstract: During language comprehension, the brain processes not only word meanings, but also the grammatical structure—the “syntax”—that strings words into phrases and sentences. Yet the neural basis of syntax remains contentious, partly due to the elusiveness of experimental designs that vary structure independently of meaning-related variables. Here, we exploit Arabic’s grammatical properties, which enable such a design. We collected magnetoencephalography (MEG) data while participants read the same noun-adjective ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(48 reference statements)
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are concordant with recent results and models implicating the pSTS in phrase composition (Nelson et al, 2017;Flick and Pylkkänen, 2020;Matchin and Hickok, 2020;Murphy, 2020;Law and Pylkkänen, 2021;Matar et al, 2021); producing hierarchically organized functional morphemes (Lee et al, 2018); sign language comprehension (Trettenbrein et al, 2021); cross-linguistic reading competence (Feng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Minimal Phrase Compositionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings are concordant with recent results and models implicating the pSTS in phrase composition (Nelson et al, 2017;Flick and Pylkkänen, 2020;Matchin and Hickok, 2020;Murphy, 2020;Law and Pylkkänen, 2021;Matar et al, 2021); producing hierarchically organized functional morphemes (Lee et al, 2018); sign language comprehension (Trettenbrein et al, 2021); cross-linguistic reading competence (Feng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Minimal Phrase Compositionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…2016 ). In our own work, we have observed “pure” effects of structure only in the left posterior temporal cortex ( Flick and Pylkkänen 2020 ; Law and Pylkkänen 2021 ; Matar et al. 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…With regard to our paradigm, it is important to note that words produced in verb contexts completed a sentence (e.g., “He dreams”), while words produced in noun contexts (“Two dreams”) did not. In fact, recent MEG work on Standard Arabic showed increased activity in the left posterior temporal lobe for length- and lexically matched sentences versus noun phrases ( Matar et al. 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in line with the role of the anterior temporal lobe described in the literature. Indeed, the temporal pole has been shown to play a role in semantic processing and language comprehension in neuroimaging 16,43,44 , MEG 45 and neuropsychological 46,47 studies (see also 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%