2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-00753-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left-handed DNA-PAINT for improved super-resolution imaging in the nucleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a definitive understanding of the events that took place and led to the observed phenotypes, one needs to be able to visualize the presence of chromosomal and plasmid DNA from the two parent cells in single cells during the selection process of Figure 1. This will require the development of new bioimaging technology not currently available for prokaryotic cells, such as the DNA PAINT technology (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a definitive understanding of the events that took place and led to the observed phenotypes, one needs to be able to visualize the presence of chromosomal and plasmid DNA from the two parent cells in single cells during the selection process of Figure 1. This will require the development of new bioimaging technology not currently available for prokaryotic cells, such as the DNA PAINT technology (20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,26,[28][29][30] Furthermore, the use of left-handed DNA has improved specificity in DNA containing samples. 31 When compared directly, resPAINT offers some advantages over DNA-PAINT in that: 1) it is fully compatible with DNA containing samples; 2) conjugation with DNA can be experimentally complex and 3) DNA-PAINT can suffer from binding-site depletion, although appropriate buffers can somewhat mitigate this. 32 Indeed, a potential application of resPAINT would be imaging DNA in whole cell nuclei with Hoechst.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, methods have been developed where the probe ‘lights up’ or is concentrated on target versus in solution by way of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), 26 fluorogenic probes, 27 repeat PAINT, 28 quenching, 29 photoactivation 30 and many others. While these strategies greatly improve volumetric imaging with DNA PAINT, they retain inherent drawbacks including: unspecific binding 31 , photocleavage 32 , the necessity of immunolabeling and an inability to observe direct binding events such as peptide/receptor interactions. Application of similar lightup strategies to Fab or small molecule binders would greatly increase the range of biological interactions that can be observed using PAINT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, live-cell applications of DNA-PAINT have so far been very limited, and only employed for imaging molecules on cell surfaces ( Strauss et al, 2018 ). A very recent study surmounted the latter challenge by designing “docker” and ‘imager’ probes with left-handed DNA (L-DNA) which do not hybridize with endogenous nucleic acids ( Geertsema et al, 2021 ). Still, it seems clear that continued refinement of these techniques will be necessary to gain further experimental insight into dynamic changes in CRU structure and function at the length scale of single RyRs.…”
Section: The Changing Interaction Of Experiments and Simulation In Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%