2014 27th Biennial Symposium on Communications (QBSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/qbsc.2014.6841213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Left degree distribution shaping for LT codes over the binary erasure channel

Abstract: Fountain codes were introduced to provide higher reliability, lower complexities, and more scalability for networks such as the Internet. Luby-Transform (LT) codes, which are the first realization of Fountain codes, achieve the capacity of the binary erasure channel (BEC) asymptotically and universally. For finite lengths, the search is continued to find codes closer to the capacity limits at even lower encoding and decoding complexities. Most previous work on single-layer Fountain coding targets the design vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, fountain codes can work in the absence of a feedback channel, even in nasty channels [8][9][10]. Such codes work on erasure channels such as binary erasure channels (BECs) [9,11,12], as well as noisy channels such as AWGN channels [13][14][15] and fading channels [16,17].…”
Section: R S1 S2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, fountain codes can work in the absence of a feedback channel, even in nasty channels [8][9][10]. Such codes work on erasure channels such as binary erasure channels (BECs) [9,11,12], as well as noisy channels such as AWGN channels [13][14][15] and fading channels [16,17].…”
Section: R S1 S2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MBLTE remembers two outcomes with values d = 1 and d = 2. When d = 1, it samples the input symbol with the highest instantaneous degree, which is defined in [20,21] as the highest degree at the time when the current output symbol is being constructed. When d = 2, it samples one input symbol from those with the highest instantaneous degrees, then another one from those symbols with the second highest instantaneous degree.…”
Section: Second-order Mbltementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works mostly rely on either feedback channels or encoding/decoding operations with higher complexities, none of which is favorable to UDNs since: (i) due to the massive number of devices, leveraging the feedback channel may not be feasible, and (ii) low-power SBS, IoT, and sensory devices are not well-suited for high complexity encoding and decoding operations. Recently, memory-based LT encoders (MBLTEs) [20][21][22][23][24] were proposed for improving the bit-error-rate (BER)/frameerror-rate (FER) performance of LT codes with relatively short block-lengths at the cost of adding memory into the encoder while maintaining the same low encoding/decoding complexity as LT codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error-floor performance of systematic LT codes transmitted over additive white Gaussian noise channels was improved in [18] by shaping the variable-node degree distribution. A similar approach was extended in [19] to improve the erasure floor performance of finite-length LT codes transmitted over erasure channels. However, these ideas cannot directly be extended to DLT codes due to the presence of a relay, which destroys the pattern of variable-node degrees at the relay.…”
Section: Erasure Floor Analysis Of Distributed Lt Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%