Abstract:BACKGROUND
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a congenital disorder accompanied by a high incidence of sudden cardiac death. beta-Adrenergic blockade is the therapy of choice, and it is successful in 75-80% of patients. For those in whom cardiac events (syncope or cardiac arrest) are not prevented by beta-blockade, experimental studies suggest that left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) may be useful.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We identified 85 LQTS patients worl… Show more
“…10 Importantly for the assessment of the present results, the population under study was at particularly high risk for arrhythmic death, as indicated by the number of symptomatic patients (99%), the high percentage (75%) of those with cardiac events despite -blockers, and the extreme average prolongation of the QT interval (QTc, 543Ϯ65 ms). The last value, which reflects a major arrhythmogenic substrate, 17 should be compared with the mean QTc (QTc, 510Ϯ60 ms) of the largest population in which the effect of -blockers was analyzed.…”
Section: Schwartz Et Al Left Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation and Lqtsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Worldwide experience with LCSD in 85 LQTS patients was reported in 1991. 10 Now, 13 years later, we thought it appropriate to review the existing data on 162 patients who underwent left sympathectomy because this large population and the long follow-up permit a more definitive assessment of the role of LCSD in the management of high-risk LQTS patients.…”
Background-The management of long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients who continue to have cardiac events (CEs) despite -blockers is complex. We assessed the long-term efficacy of left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) in a group of high-risk patients. Methods and Results-We identified 147 LQTS patients who underwent LCSD. Their QT interval was very prolonged (QTc, 543Ϯ65 ms); 99% were symptomatic; 48% had a cardiac arrest; and 75% of those treated with -blockers remained symptomatic. The average follow-up periods between first CE and LCSD and post-LCSD were 4.6 and 7.8 years, respectively. After LCSD, 46% remained asymptomatic. Syncope occurred in 31%, aborted cardiac arrest in 16%, and sudden death in 7%. The mean yearly number of CEs per patient dropped by 91% (PϽ0.001). Among 74 patients with only syncope before LCSD, all types of CEs decreased significantly as in the entire group, and a post-LCSD QTc Ͻ500 ms predicted very low risk. The percentage of patients with Ͼ5 CEs declined from 55% to 8% (PϽ0.001). In 5 patients with preoperative implantable defibrillator and multiple discharges, the post-LCSD count of shocks decreased by 95% (Pϭ0.02) from a median number of 25 to 0 per patient. Among 51 genotyped patients, LCSD appeared more effective in LQT1 and LQT3 patients. Conclusions-LCSD is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aborted cardiac arrest and syncope in high-risk LQTS patients when compared with pre-LCSD events. However, LCSD is not entirely effective in preventing cardiac events including sudden cardiac death during long-term follow-up. LCSD should be considered in patients with recurrent syncope despite -blockade and in patients who experience arrhythmia storms with an implanted defibrillator.
“…10 Importantly for the assessment of the present results, the population under study was at particularly high risk for arrhythmic death, as indicated by the number of symptomatic patients (99%), the high percentage (75%) of those with cardiac events despite -blockers, and the extreme average prolongation of the QT interval (QTc, 543Ϯ65 ms). The last value, which reflects a major arrhythmogenic substrate, 17 should be compared with the mean QTc (QTc, 510Ϯ60 ms) of the largest population in which the effect of -blockers was analyzed.…”
Section: Schwartz Et Al Left Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation and Lqtsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Worldwide experience with LCSD in 85 LQTS patients was reported in 1991. 10 Now, 13 years later, we thought it appropriate to review the existing data on 162 patients who underwent left sympathectomy because this large population and the long follow-up permit a more definitive assessment of the role of LCSD in the management of high-risk LQTS patients.…”
Background-The management of long-QT syndrome (LQTS) patients who continue to have cardiac events (CEs) despite -blockers is complex. We assessed the long-term efficacy of left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) in a group of high-risk patients. Methods and Results-We identified 147 LQTS patients who underwent LCSD. Their QT interval was very prolonged (QTc, 543Ϯ65 ms); 99% were symptomatic; 48% had a cardiac arrest; and 75% of those treated with -blockers remained symptomatic. The average follow-up periods between first CE and LCSD and post-LCSD were 4.6 and 7.8 years, respectively. After LCSD, 46% remained asymptomatic. Syncope occurred in 31%, aborted cardiac arrest in 16%, and sudden death in 7%. The mean yearly number of CEs per patient dropped by 91% (PϽ0.001). Among 74 patients with only syncope before LCSD, all types of CEs decreased significantly as in the entire group, and a post-LCSD QTc Ͻ500 ms predicted very low risk. The percentage of patients with Ͼ5 CEs declined from 55% to 8% (PϽ0.001). In 5 patients with preoperative implantable defibrillator and multiple discharges, the post-LCSD count of shocks decreased by 95% (Pϭ0.02) from a median number of 25 to 0 per patient. Among 51 genotyped patients, LCSD appeared more effective in LQT1 and LQT3 patients. Conclusions-LCSD is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aborted cardiac arrest and syncope in high-risk LQTS patients when compared with pre-LCSD events. However, LCSD is not entirely effective in preventing cardiac events including sudden cardiac death during long-term follow-up. LCSD should be considered in patients with recurrent syncope despite -blockade and in patients who experience arrhythmia storms with an implanted defibrillator.
“…Furthermore, epinephrine may induce torsade, whereas left sympathectomy and β-blockers are antiarrhythmic in LQT1. 56,57 These studies suggest that sympathetic activation is arrhythmogenic if I Ks is abnormal or down-regulated. Furthermore, over-expression of NGF in adult transgenic mice results in further decrease in density of at least 2 other potassium currents, I to and I Kur .…”
Section: Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure and Sympathetic Innervmentioning
The cardiac autonomic nervous system consists of 2 branches-the sympathetic and the parasympathetic systems-that work in a delicately tuned, yet opposing fashion in the heart. This extrinsic control mechanism can dominate intrinsic regulatory mechanisms that modulate heart rate and cardiac output. These branches differ in their neurotransmitters (norepinephrine and acetylcholine) and exert stimulatory or inhibitory effects on target tissue via adrenergic and muscarinic receptors. Stimulation of the sympathetic branch exerts facilitatory effects on function, increasing heart rate and myocardial contractility, whereas the stimulation of the parasympathetic branch exerts inhibitory effects that decrease heart rate and contractility. The interplay between these two branches is complex and susceptible to control at several levels, from centrally mediated baroreceptors and chemoreceptors to local interneuronal interactions.Alterations in autonomic function occur in several interrelated cardiac conditions including sudden cardiac death, congestive heart failure, diabetic neuropathy, and myocardial ischemia. Although the full extent of these changes has not been elucidated, multiple autonomic remodeling mechanisms have been observed at both the neuronal fiber and myocardial cellular level that contribute to an arrhythmogenic substrate. We describe the anatomy of both systems in this review. However, the review will premdominantly focus on the sympathetic system, whose role in the modulation of cardiac arrhythmias is slightly better delineated.
Cardiac Autonomic Innervation: NeuroanatomyBoth branches of the autonomic nervous system are composed of both afferent and efferent as well interneuronal fibers (Fig 1). Sympathetic innervation originates mainly in the right and left stellate ganglia. These fibers travel along the epicardial vascular structures of the heart and penetrate into the underlying myocardium similar to coronary vessels and end as sympathetic nerve terminals reaching the endocardium. Based on norepinephrine content studies, a gradient exists in sympathetic innervation from atria to the ventricles and from base to apex of the heart. Therefore, the atria are most densely innervated, but the ventricles are also supplied with a sympathetic network, most densely at the base. 1 Parasympathetic effects are carried by the right and left vagus nerves, originating in the medulla. The vagus nerve further divides into the superior and inferior cardiac nerves, finally merging with the postganglionic sympathetic neurons to form a plexus of nerves at the base of the heart, known as the cardiac plexus. In contrast to sympathetic neurons, after parasympathetic fibers cross the atrioventricular (AV) groove along the surface of the heart,
“…[2][3][4] Torsade de pointes associated with the long QT syndrome is often elicited by sudden increases in sympathetic activity 8 and can be suppressed by -adrenergic blocking agents 9 or by ablation of the left stellate ganglion. 10 Isoproterenol infusion prolongs the MAP duration and induces EADs in patients with long QT syndrome. 11 In addition, left stellate stimulation increases the amplitude of EADs induced by Cs and increases the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in dogs.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.