Left behind but doing good? Civic engagement in two post-socialist countries

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E ABSTRACT Left Behind but Doing Good? Civic Engagement in Two Post-Socialist Countries *The fall of socialism in Central and Eastern Europe restored ordinary citizens' rights and freedoms and ended their political and social isolation. While the freedom of movement was quickly embraced, civil society revival lagged due to the eroded civic norms, declining social capital, and worsening economic conditions. In this paper, we examine the link between the out-migration of relatives and friends and the pro-social behavior of the left behinds in two post-socialist countries -Bulgaria and Romania -the EU's poorest, unhappiest, and among the most corrupt members. We show that having close contacts abroad is consistently positively associated with civic engagement and that the cultural transmission of norms from abroad could be driving the results. Specifically, the strength of the civic engagement culture of the family or friend's destination matters for the pro-social behavior of respondents in the home countries. Our results imply that the emigration of family and friends may have positive but previously undocumented consequences for the individuals and communities left behind in Bulgaria and Romania. Given civil society's role for development in post-socialist Europe and the socio-economic and institutional challenges that Bulgaria and Romania face compared with the rest of the EU, understanding the channels fostering civil society and wellbeing are important for national and EU policymakers. JEL Classification:I30, I31, F22, P30, Z10

Transnational remittances and state protection of human rights: A case for caution

“…The institutional impact of international remittances has emerged as an important area of research in the last decade or so; with increasing scholarly effort being devoted to exploring the consequences of such transfers on the quality of governance (Abdih, Chami, Dagher, & Montiel, ), the level of corruption (Tyburski, , ), the composition of public expenditure (Doyle, ), the likelihood of civil conflict (Regan & Frank, ), the persistence (Ahmed, , , ), and democratization (Escriba‐Folch, Meseguer, & Wright, ) of autocratic regimes, and the level of political (Meseguer & Burgess, ) and civic (Nikolova, Roman, & Zimmerman, ) engagement of the population. To the best of our knowledge, however, the present study is the first to undertake a rigorous empirical investigation of the impact of international remittances on a fundamental measure of institutional quality in the form of state protection of human rights.…”

Diaspora economics: new perspectives

“…They can be norms about everyday behaviour, notions about family responsibility and gender roles, perceptions about human rights, the value of education, concepts about freedom of religion, general information sharing about hygiene, and civic participation. Nikolova et al (2016), in fact, show that the left-behind families in Bulgaria and Romania who had close contacts with immigrants abroad exhibited higher civic engagement. They speculate that the cultural transmission of norms from abroad could be driving the results.…”

Regulations for Returning Labour Migrants to Ukraine: International Background and National Limitations

“…A number of publications show that migration can affect various socio-economic aspects of life, such as poverty and income (King 2002;Adams 2011), well-being (Nikolova, Graham 2015;Ivlevs et al 2019), education and culture (Cortes 2015;Marekova et al 2015), health (Gibson et al 2011), social norms (Levitt 1998; Markowska-Manista 2016), corrupt behaviour (Ivlevs, King 2017), fertility (Beine et al 2013), and civic and political engagement (Nikolova et al 2017;Chauvet, Mercier 2014). The phenomenon of international migration has been a pressing issue lately, extending beyond the borders of a single continent.…”