Background
2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) atrial strain (ε) analysis in children is gaining interest; however, pediatric nomograms remain limited. Comparison among conventional software's (designed for left ventricle and adapted to atria and using R‐gating analysis) and new software's (designed for atria and allowing for both R‐ and P‐gating) are lacking. The present study aims to establish pediatric nomograms for atrial ε using an atrial dedicated software and to compare values obtained by (a) R‐ and P‐gating and, (b) R‐gating with new and conventional software.
Methods
Echocardiographic measurements included STE left (LA) and right (RA) atrial longitudinal reservoir, conduit and contractile ε. Age/weigh/height/heart rate, and body surface area (BSA) were used as independent variables in the statistical analysis.
Results
In all, 580 healthy subjects (age range, 31 days‐18 years; mean age 7.5 years; median age 7.1 years; inter‐quartile range, 4.3–10.7 months; 45.5% female) were included. Feasibility of atrial ε measurements was high (98.9–96.8%). At lower age, atrial conduit ε was lower (p<0.001) while contractile ε was higher (p<0.001). All atrial ε values calculated with P‐gating method were lower—than R‐gating values (p<0.001). R‐gated LA ε reservoir values generated with the new software were lower, and R‐gated RA contractile ε higher than with the conventional software (p<0.011).
Conclusion
We report pediatric atrial ε values from a dedicated atrial software. Maturational changes in STE atrial ε values were demonstrated. Significant differences were observed among ε values obtained with P‐ and R‐gating and with different software's.