1997
DOI: 10.1142/s0218625x97001693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEED STRUCTURE ANALYSES OF THE CLEAN AND FULLY HYDROGEN-COVERED W(110) and Mo(110) SURFACES

Abstract: We present a comparative low energy electron diffraction (LEED) structure analysis for the clean as well as hydrogen-saturated (110) surfaces of tungsten and molybdenum. Both clean surfaces exhibit some contraction of the first interlayer spacing, i.e. -3.1% for W and -4.0% for Mo, whereas deeper layer distances remain practically bulklike. The only structural consequence of a hydrogen monolayer adsorbed is the reduction of the first interlayer distance contraction to approximately half its value of the clean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that the TF site is the most stable site, which is consistent with Arnold and Scheffler's LEED and DFT studies and the DFT-LDA study [16][17][18]. The structural parameters are also consistent with Arnold and Scheffler's study and the DFT-LDA study [17,18].…”
Section: H Adsorption On the W(1 1 0) Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that the TF site is the most stable site, which is consistent with Arnold and Scheffler's LEED and DFT studies and the DFT-LDA study [16][17][18]. The structural parameters are also consistent with Arnold and Scheffler's study and the DFT-LDA study [17,18].…”
Section: H Adsorption On the W(1 1 0) Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They insisted that the first layer of the W substrate is reconstructed moving toward the 1 1 0 direction. Recently, this adsorption structure model was questioned by LEED I-V experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations by Arnold and Scheffler [16,17]. They found little reconstruction of the first layer of the W substrate, and that the TF sites are the most stable hydrogen adsorption sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in good agreement with earlier theoretical studies [15][16][17][18] as well as LEED measurements. 12 The results presented in Table I show that the increase in the slab thickness above seven layers does not change considerably the atomic structure of the surface. Therefore, in the rest part of this work the Mo͑110͒ surface has been described by a slab composed of seven atomic layers.…”
Section: A Clean Mo(110) Substratementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Taking into account the corresponding experimental result of 3.15 Å provided by LEED measurements, 12 …”
Section: Methods Of Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the value of "pure" effect, in fact, is even greater. In addition, we note that the lack of surface reconstruction under the hydrogen adsorption on the tungsten (110) surface also contributes to the manifestation of this effect [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%