2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2005.09.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEED and DFT investigation on the (2×2)-S overlayer on Co(0001)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low Co coverage, when part of the Au(111) surface is uncovered, we could observe locally some hexagonal molecular packing on Co with molecular orientations compatible with either a ( 3 3) × or a (2 2) × structure (cf inset of figure 2(b)). It is worth noting that according to first principles calculations for methanethiolate on Co(0001) [21], the (2 2) × and ( 3 3) × structures lie very close in energy, and for the case of sulfur adsorption on Co(0001), the (2 2) × superstructure has been experimentally observed with LEED ( [33]) and theoretically predicted to be the most stable structure [34]. In order to complete the characterization of the SAMs on the Co layers, we have performed AES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At low Co coverage, when part of the Au(111) surface is uncovered, we could observe locally some hexagonal molecular packing on Co with molecular orientations compatible with either a ( 3 3) × or a (2 2) × structure (cf inset of figure 2(b)). It is worth noting that according to first principles calculations for methanethiolate on Co(0001) [21], the (2 2) × and ( 3 3) × structures lie very close in energy, and for the case of sulfur adsorption on Co(0001), the (2 2) × superstructure has been experimentally observed with LEED ( [33]) and theoretically predicted to be the most stable structure [34]. In order to complete the characterization of the SAMs on the Co layers, we have performed AES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Experimental studies of interaction of H 2 S with close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces (Ag(1 1 1) [7], Au(1 1 1) [8], Co(0 0 0 1) [9], Cu(1 1 1) [10] and Pt(1 1 1) [11]) as well as with the corresponding open surfaces (Ag(1 0 0) [12,13], Au(1 0 0), Au(1 1 0) [14][15][16], Cu(1 0 0) [17], Mo(1 0 0) [18], Ni(1 0 0) [19][20][21], Ni(1 1 0) [22], Pd(1 0 0) [23], Rh(1 0 0) [24], Ru(1 1 0) [25], W(1 0 0) [26]) were reported. A variety of techniques such as low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), normal incidence X-ray standing wave (NIXSW) analysis, temperature program desorption (TPD), high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) were utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts have included work on close-packed surfaces of transition (Co(0 0 0 1) [9], Ru(0 0 0 1) [27][28][29][30], Ir(1 1 1) [31], Ni(1 1 1) [32][33][34][35], Pd(1 1 1) [36][37][38][39][40], Pt(1 1 1) [41][42][43][44], Rh(1 1 1) [45][46][47]) and noble metals (Ag(1 1 1) [12,48,49], Au(1 1 1) [50][51][52], Cu(1 1 1) [53][54][55]). The formation of ( p 3 Â p 3) R30°structure on the (1 1 1) surfaces was frequently observed while the (2 Â 2) structure was commonly reported on the (0 0 0 1) face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, even at the absolute temperature of T = 0 K, the quantum vibrations of the foreign atom would make the uncertainty of its position comparable with the characteristic dimension of its K shell. Using the Debey approximate treatment of the effect of thermal vibrations [29] and an estimated value of the Debey temperature of the foreign atom, being 300 K [44], one can calculate that for T = 0 K, the one-dimensional thermal vibration amplitude of the foreign atom is 6.2 pm. On the other hand, the characteristic dimension of the K shell of the foreign atom is 5.1 pm, and the characteristic dimensions of its L and M shells are about 25 and 100 pm, respectively [45].…”
Section: Rainbow Subatomic Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%