2020
DOI: 10.31993/2308-6459-2020-103-4-13989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leds and semiochemicals vs. sex pheromones: tests of the european corn borer attractivity in the Krasnodar territory

Abstract: In two geographical points of the Krasnodar Territory, viz. vil. Botanika, Gulkevichi District (eastern subzone of the Central natural-economic zone of the Krasnodar Territory) and st. Kurchanskaya, Temryuk District (Anapo-Taman natural-economic zone) on industrial plantations of maize, Delta sticky traps supplied with various baits were tested for attractiveness for adults of the European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. In contrast to sex pheromones, traps with ‘bisex lure’ (semiochemicals phenylace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Installation of the light traps inside dense, tall vegetation (maize plants) prevent propagation of light and attracted insects only from a short distance, i. e. the inhabitants of the corn field. This approach allows to minimize the non-target insects (Frolov et al, 2020). In present data the responses to green light in the wind tunnel were higher than control, but since there was no difference between male (38%) and female (40%) responses to this stimulus, green light cannot be considered as oviposition attractant for ECB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Installation of the light traps inside dense, tall vegetation (maize plants) prevent propagation of light and attracted insects only from a short distance, i. e. the inhabitants of the corn field. This approach allows to minimize the non-target insects (Frolov et al, 2020). In present data the responses to green light in the wind tunnel were higher than control, but since there was no difference between male (38%) and female (40%) responses to this stimulus, green light cannot be considered as oviposition attractant for ECB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Bucket funnel traps (Epsky et al, 2008) used in the study were modified by installing a lightemitting unit as it was described by the patent RU201632U1 "Light pheromone trap for flying insects". Description of the trap design, its setup and manual for use were published earlier (Frolov et al, 2020). Traps were placed at the level of 2/3 of plant height, as a rule, at the height of the cob attachment and were arranged as follows: 8-10 m in a row, 50 m between rows and were positioned in 30 m from the edge deep into the cornfield.…”
Section: Field Trappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although synthetic pheromone lures are widely used for ECB monitoring (Pélozuelo and Frérot, 2007), including in Europe (Kárpáti et al, 2016), there are indications that they can sometimes show unreliable trapping activity (Szőcs and Babendreier, 2011). In field tests in Europe, the bisexual lure clearly surpassed the activity of synthetic ECB pheromones (both Z and E pheromonal strains) (Tóth et al, 2017;Frolov et al, 2020aFrolov et al, , 2020b. In the present study trapping data suggest that the bisexual lure may work better for catching ACB than the synthetic pheromone lure, making the case similar to that observed for ECB in Europe, however, due to the relatively low numbers captured this finding needs more detailed studies to be conducted in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4A and 5A). The inferior performance of pheromone traps in the field can be explained not only by the concurrent attraction of virgin males by calling females (Unnithan and Saxena, 1991;Kondo et al, 1993;Evenden et al, 2015;Frolov et al, 2020aFrolov et al, , 2020b but also by the fact that male moths temporarily loose or decrease the sensitivity to sex pheromones after mating (Gadenne et al, 2001;Fischer and King, 2008;Barrozo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%