1904
DOI: 10.1037/10789-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lectures on clinical psychiatry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
117
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Kraepelin [9] viewed schizophrenia (dementia praecox) as a distinct singular disease entity.…”
Section: The Past Nosology Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further, Kraepelin [9] viewed schizophrenia (dementia praecox) as a distinct singular disease entity.…”
Section: The Past Nosology Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kraepelin [9] and Bleuler's [8] conception of schizophrenia differed through their preferred mode of defining the disorder with; Kraepelin's [9] definition being based on an epidemiological stance and Bleuler [8] favoring a nosological account of schizophrenia. [10,19] Conceptually, their definitions of the disorder were highly congruent.…”
Section: The Past Nosology Of Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was Kraepelin (1904) who finally, on the basis of continuing and systematic observations on a vast number of patients, applied the brilliant principle which transformed the nosologic chaos of the times. By his painstaking work, he was able to show that the apparently diverse entities of the four-stage insanity of Zeller, the catatonia of Kahlbaum, the hebephrenia of Hecker, the folie circulaire of Falret and the multitude of enfeeblements and excitements, could be resolved into the twin abstractions of Dementia Praecox and Manic-Depressive psychosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%