2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9406-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecture capture podcasts: differential student use and performance in a large introductory course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These mixed findings may arise from differences in the populations sampled because student characteristics are known to influence use of capture. For example, research has shown impact of proficiency in the language in which one is taught (Molnar, 2011;Revell, 2013), gender (Williams, Aguilar-Roca, & O'Dowd, 2016) study year (Nordmann, Calder, Bishop, Irwin, & Comber, 2017), academic ability and learning approach (Brady et al, 2013;Newton & McCunn, 2015;Owston, Lupshenyuk, & Wideman, 2011;Vajoczki et al, 2011) on use of lecture capture. It is also likely that the effect of lecture capture on performance differs when students use it to supplement and substitute for attendance at the live lecture, with stronger students being more likely to supplement attendance (Von Konsky, Ivins, & Gribble, 2009) and weaker students more likely to substitute (Vajoczki et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mixed findings may arise from differences in the populations sampled because student characteristics are known to influence use of capture. For example, research has shown impact of proficiency in the language in which one is taught (Molnar, 2011;Revell, 2013), gender (Williams, Aguilar-Roca, & O'Dowd, 2016) study year (Nordmann, Calder, Bishop, Irwin, & Comber, 2017), academic ability and learning approach (Brady et al, 2013;Newton & McCunn, 2015;Owston, Lupshenyuk, & Wideman, 2011;Vajoczki et al, 2011) on use of lecture capture. It is also likely that the effect of lecture capture on performance differs when students use it to supplement and substitute for attendance at the live lecture, with stronger students being more likely to supplement attendance (Von Konsky, Ivins, & Gribble, 2009) and weaker students more likely to substitute (Vajoczki et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the recording of lectures and their distribution over the internet for playback on personal computers or portable media devices the terms podcast lectures (Evans 2008;Pilarski et al 2008), lecture podcasts (Abdous et al 2012;Walls et al 2010;Williams et al 2016), or video podcasts (Kay 2012) are often employed. Typically, the lecturer's presentation is recorded as film, combined with the lecture slides, and broadcasted in video format (McGarr 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aldamen et al (2015) state that a slight positive relationship was observed between captured lecture viewership and performance in their class. However, others state that there is essentially no difference between video users and non-users (Bosshardt and Chiang, 2016;Hadgu et al, 2016;Williams et al, 2016). Day and Foley (2006) attempted to quantify the benefit of lecture capture material by dividing a class into two groups, a group who attended lectures as normal and a group who were offered access to lecture recordings.…”
Section: Exam Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%