1999
DOI: 10.1021/es9900353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LeBoeuf's Comment on “Evaluation of the Glassy/Rubbery Model for Soil Organic Matter”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solutes would likely have different affinities to these regions and could possibly sorb there via a different mechanism. This description is consistent with the distributed reactivity model (DRM) proposed for the sorption of aqueous organics to soils and sediments (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). The model assumes that multiple sorption mechanisms of different reactivities can operate in parallel with differences in the reactivity being due to inhomogeneities in natural organic matter resulting from their various geologic ages.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Solutes would likely have different affinities to these regions and could possibly sorb there via a different mechanism. This description is consistent with the distributed reactivity model (DRM) proposed for the sorption of aqueous organics to soils and sediments (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). The model assumes that multiple sorption mechanisms of different reactivities can operate in parallel with differences in the reactivity being due to inhomogeneities in natural organic matter resulting from their various geologic ages.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the first paper in this series (25), a more refined view of NOM was developed to encompass the inherent heterogeneity of natural organic matter as one originating from a complex conglomeration of bits and pieces of degraded or partially degraded biopolymers that manifest themselves into mechanically different rubbery and glassy states. Sorption of HOCs from aqueous solution within these matrices has been characterized as both linear (e.g., refs 29-33) and nonlinear sorption processes (e.g., refs 12, 34-40), and the relative nonlinearity of the sorption isotherm has been attributed to the presence of more condensed, diagenetically altered, glasslike regions of NOM (12,25,(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45) or similarly to microporous regions of carbonaceous (e.g., soot) materials in soils (46)(47)(48). In this section, we expand our database of observed nonlinear sorption in sorbents with known glass transition temperatures (Tg) in an effort to further establish the role of macromolecular mobility in influencing sorption isotherm linearity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%