2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-012-0166-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lebensstile und Wohnstandortwahl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Otte and Baur 2008, p. 108;Schneider and Spellerberg 1999, p. 192 f.). However, studies conducted at the neighborhood level have shown that the effects of people's lifestyle preferences on their residential choices are rather weak after their economic resources and family status are taken into account (Rössel and Hölscher 2012;Otte 2004). According to Otte (2004, p. 354 f.), economic conditions and living arrangements are the actual drivers of the residential decision-making process.…”
Section: Spatial Inequalities From a Social Stratification Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otte and Baur 2008, p. 108;Schneider and Spellerberg 1999, p. 192 f.). However, studies conducted at the neighborhood level have shown that the effects of people's lifestyle preferences on their residential choices are rather weak after their economic resources and family status are taken into account (Rössel and Hölscher 2012;Otte 2004). According to Otte (2004, p. 354 f.), economic conditions and living arrangements are the actual drivers of the residential decision-making process.…”
Section: Spatial Inequalities From a Social Stratification Point Of Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restrictions on actions in a given situation can thus be relatively independent of the socio-structural position of an actor, though in some cases, they may be indirectly influenced by it. Thus, being relatively well endowed in a socio-economic sense, for example, can lead to a relatively open choice of where to live, for example, in a location equipped with the kinds of cultural infrastructure that is preferred (Rössel and Hölscher, 2012). This does depend on the particular manner in which inequality is regionally distributed, the balancing-out effects a welfare state may have on regional inequality and the particular cultural policy in a given country (Häussermann and Siebel, 1995).…”
Section: Cultural Consumption and Social Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection bias occurs when unobserved factors influence both the selection into the treatment (i. e., the neighborhood) and the outcome under study. If, for example, due to different lifestyle tastes our measures of social status do a poor job in predicting people's residential choice (Rçssel & Hoelscher 2012), and their lifestyles, in turn, influence their children's educational performance due to different parenting practices, we would confound a potential neighborhood effect with an individual effect of people's unobserved lifestyles. On the other hand, the inherent endogeneity of neighborhood effect leads to a confusion of causes and effects.…”
Section: Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%