GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2009.5426118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least Squares Estimation for the Digital Compensation of Tx Leakage in zero-IF Receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…t=nT Rx (19) This reference of power P u is synthesized in the reference generator (see Figure 1) from the baseband Tx samples, and it can be noted that in practice, it might need additional processing, such as an upsampler, filters, and a resampler. Based on the observation model described in (17), the TxL channel evolution described in (12) and (13), and the reference in (19), the estimation process consists of the estimation of the time-varying complex gain β TxL (n) and the fractional delay δ. The estimation error is defined by:…”
Section: Observation Model and Estimation Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…t=nT Rx (19) This reference of power P u is synthesized in the reference generator (see Figure 1) from the baseband Tx samples, and it can be noted that in practice, it might need additional processing, such as an upsampler, filters, and a resampler. Based on the observation model described in (17), the TxL channel evolution described in (12) and (13), and the reference in (19), the estimation process consists of the estimation of the time-varying complex gain β TxL (n) and the fractional delay δ. The estimation error is defined by:…”
Section: Observation Model and Estimation Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are based on the knowledge of the transmitted signal and require the estimation of the so-called TxL channel that characterizes the Tx-Rx isolation of the duplexer and the Rx path. Different channel models are used in the literature, from a single constant coefficient [5,16], to an exponential decay filter [17], or a more general finite impulse response filter [9]. However, literature methods do not take into account that the duplexer isolation is time varying, as showed by [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the IMD2 interference related DC is removed from the received signal which complicates the IMD2 replica estimation. This DC removal is considered in [6,11], and neglected in [7]- [9,14]. [6] with improved steady-state cancellation and convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many publications available on reduction of the Tx leakage using active cancellation [2]- [8]. The baseband cancellation presented in [2] has a relatively limited performance in a presence of power amplifier intermodulation products or when a Rx front-end saturates due to high leakage power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseband cancellation presented in [2] has a relatively limited performance in a presence of power amplifier intermodulation products or when a Rx front-end saturates due to high leakage power. The methods presented in [3]- [7] use one or two auxiliary signal paths to cancel the leakage of a circulator type of duplexer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%