2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11052126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Least Squares Boosting Ensemble and Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization for Predicting the Surface Roughness in Face Milling Process of Aluminum Material

Abstract: Surface roughness is a significant factor in determining the product quality and highly impacts the production price. The ability to predict the surface roughness before production would save the time and resources of the process. This research investigated the performance of state-of-the-art machine learning and quantum behaved evolutionary computation methods in predicting the surface roughness of aluminum material in a face-milling machine. Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) and least square… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each particle represents a potential optimal solution of the search space and the characteristics of particle are displayed by three indexes of position, velocity and fitness value. The particle moves in the solution space [17]. By tracking the trajectories of the particle, it updates the position and speed of individual constantly to follow the optimal output.…”
Section: ) Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each particle represents a potential optimal solution of the search space and the characteristics of particle are displayed by three indexes of position, velocity and fitness value. The particle moves in the solution space [17]. By tracking the trajectories of the particle, it updates the position and speed of individual constantly to follow the optimal output.…”
Section: ) Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to the old technique, this approach is capable of developing superior predictive models. Situations where there are uncertainties in data representation, solution objectives, modelling techniques, or the presence of random initial seeds in a model are all good reasons to use the EML method [10]. The basic learners are the instances or candidate methods.…”
Section: Ensemble Machine Learning (Eml) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each base learner operates separately, as in a standard machine learning technique, and the results are eventually integrated to generate a single robust output. For regression and classification methods, the combination could be done using any of the averaging (simple or weighted) methods and voting (majority or weighted) methods [11][12][13].…”
Section: Ensemble Machine Learning (Eml) Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes demonstrate that KPCA IRBF can lower the RMSE of RVM by over 30% and decrease the confidence interval (CI) width by over 90 percent. Alajmi and Almeshal [10][11][12] proposed different machine learning methods such as ANFIS-PSO, XGBoost-SDA, Gaussian process regression algorithm, and least squares boosting ensemble, and quantum-behaved PSO to solve manufacturing processes (e.g., drilling, turning, and milling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%