46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Wake Regimes from Snapshot Data

Abstract: Fluid wakes are often categorized by visual inspection according to the number and grouping of vortices shed per cycle (e.g., 2S, 2P, P+S). While such categorizations have proven useful for describing and comparing wakes, the criterion excludes features that are essential to a wake's evolution (i.e., the relative positions and strengths of the shed vortices). For example, not all 2P wakes exhibit the same dynamics; thus, the evolution of wake patterns among 2P wakes can be markedly distinct. Here, we explore t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This identification of distinct regimes has similarities to previous studies on the wake of oscillating cylinders [44,45,46,4,47] as well as in biomimetic propulsion [48,49,50]. However, the visual identification employed in these past studies is impractical for more complex flows; a fact that has motivated data-driven approaches to this problem [51,52,53]. However, these prior data-driven efforts have focused on idealized wakes, using point vortices for example, and have mostly assumed a-priori knowledge of the possible wake patterns in order to classify observed wakes into these known categories.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This identification of distinct regimes has similarities to previous studies on the wake of oscillating cylinders [44,45,46,4,47] as well as in biomimetic propulsion [48,49,50]. However, the visual identification employed in these past studies is impractical for more complex flows; a fact that has motivated data-driven approaches to this problem [51,52,53]. However, these prior data-driven efforts have focused on idealized wakes, using point vortices for example, and have mostly assumed a-priori knowledge of the possible wake patterns in order to classify observed wakes into these known categories.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The dynamical differences between each of these 2P wakes suggests that there may be much more information to glean from a wake signature simply by considering the wake dynamics; associating a wake signature with a particular wake regime can allow inferences about the wake generating system. Although future work is still needed to establish connections between specific wake dynamics and various swimming characteristics [36], the study here will demonstrate that different wake regimes impart distinct hydrodynamic signatures that can enable wake detection and classification from sensor measurements. For example, a carangiform swimmer (2S wake generator) can be distinguished from an anguilliform swimmer (2P wake generator) from hydrodynamic wake signatures alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the event that the wake type is unknown during the library construction stage, then an unsupervised wake regime learning strategy can be devised to group and label wakes according to similarities in their dynamics. 8 Once the library is constructed, we can proceed to classify unknown wakes by comparing against entries in the library. To do so, the measured time-series signal is converted into a static feature vector V test , then compared against entries in the library to determine the "closest match" and the most likely classification of the unknown wake type (see Fig.…”
Section: Wake Classification Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the wake types were unknown at this point, unsupervised wake regime learning techniques could be used to assign these labels automatically. 8 The short-time Fourier algorithm described in Section II can also be used to extract feature vectors V i , now from datastreams in online applications. Here, we used an overlap percentage of 50%.…”
Section: Iva Feature Extraction and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%