Learning Together for and with the Martuwarra Fitzroy River

Abstract

Co-production across scientific and Indigenous knowledge systems has become a cornerstone of research to enhance knowledge, practice, ethics, and foster sustainability transformations. However, the profound differences in world views and the complex and contested histories of nation-state colonisation on Indigenous territories, highlight both opportunities and risks for Indigenous people when engaging with knowledge co-production. This paper investigates the conditions under which knowledge co-production can lead to improved Indigenous adaptive environmental planning and management among remote land-attached Indigenous peoples through a case study with ten Traditional Owner groups in the Martuwarra (Fitzroy River) Catchment in Western Australia’s Kimberley region. The research team built a 3D map of the river and used it, together with an interactive table-top projector, to bring together both scientific and Indigenous spatial knowledge. Participatory influence mapping, aligned with Traditional Owner priorities to achieve cultural governance and management planning goals set out in the Fitzroy River Declaration, investigated power relations. An analytical framework, examining underlying mechanisms of social learning, knowledge promotion and enhancing influence, based on different theories of change, was applied to unpack the immediate outcomes from these activities. The analysis identified that knowledge co-production activities improved the accessibility of the knowledge, the experiences of the knowledge users, strengthened collective identity and partnerships, and strengthened Indigenous-led institutions. The focus on cultural governance and management planning goals in the Fitzroy River Declaration enabled the activities to directly affect key drivers of Indigenous adaptive environmental planning and management—the Indigenous-led institutions. The nation-state arrangements also gave some support to local learning and decision-making through a key Indigenous institution, Martuwarra Fitzroy River Council. Knowledge co-production with remote land-attached Indigenous peoples can improve adaptive environmental planning and management where it fosters learning together, is grounded in the Indigenous-led institutions and addresses their priorities.

Place in legal geography: Agency and application in agriculture research

“…It is widely argued that policy feasibility and efficacy is raised by the incorporation of local knowledge of places, termed “vernacular” by Bartel (2014; see also Adams, 2004; Chapin et al, 2010; Fazey et al, 2010: Howitt & Suchet‐Pearson, 2006; Matallo Junior, 2021; Ostrom, 2007; Parsons, 2004; Sanderson, 2006; Simpson et al, 2015; Scott, 1998; Vanclay, 2004; Wagner, 2007). Although conflation is to be avoided, there are notable parallels with traditional ecological knowledge, customary law, and Indigenous knowledge, and knowledge co‐production, as there are between relational‐materialism and Indigenous ontologies and worldviews (see Ayre & Mackenzie, 2012; Baker, 1992; Berkes et al, 2000; Ens & Turpin, 2022; Hill et al, 2021; Robinson, Gellie, et al, 2021; Todd, 2016; Wooltorton et al, 2022).…”

A well‐being framework for cross‐cultural assessment of development scenarios: A case study from North‐Western Australia

“…Developing scenarios based on the ontologies of the local Traditional Owner groups was not identified as priority in the research needs analysis preceding this study (Hill et al, 2016). However, their participation in this study contributed to their interest in creating building blocks towards a better future (see Hill et al, 2022 fig. 4).…”

Synthesis of Australian cross‐cultural ecology featuring a decade of annual Indigenous ecological knowledge symposia at the Ecological Society of Australia conferences

“…Innovative governance processes that privilege Indigenous over Western ways have evolved, such as through the Healthy Country Planning initiative (e.g. Moorcroft et al 2012) and other co-design frameworks, that place Indigenous people and Country at the centre of planning and managememnt processes (Austin et al 2019;Hill et al 2021). On the ground, practical application of cross-cultural knowledge in IPAs has been increasing, notably around fire and species management (Ens et al 2015) and has been variably described as two-way, both-ways, right-way, biocultural or ecocultural approaches.…”