1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.1993.tb00082.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Succeed: What European Firms Can Learn from Japanese Approaches to Strategic Alliances

Abstract: Japanese companies seem able to gain knowledge from their partners in more efficient ways than their European counterparts. Case examples are given in which the European firm, or the Japanese firm begins in the dominant knowhow position. Other examples of strategic alliances between Japanese small businesses are also cited. A learning model is advanced which illustrates the evolution of power through intra-and inter-firm learning processes. An organizational capacity to enhance systemic learning seems to be th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A loss of knowledge by one partner via asymmetrical learning may result in the creation of a new or stronger competitor. Various studies have considered the unintended loss of knowledge by Western firms in technology sharing alliances with Japanese firms (e.g., Pucik, 1988;Reich & Mankin, 1986;Teramoto, Richter, & Iwasaki, 1993). Other research has considered the dangers of outsourcing and manufacturing-based alliances in leading to knowledge appropriation (Bettis, Bradley, & Hamel, 1992;Lei & Slocum, 1992).…”
Section: The Other Side Of Learning: Protecting Knowledgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A loss of knowledge by one partner via asymmetrical learning may result in the creation of a new or stronger competitor. Various studies have considered the unintended loss of knowledge by Western firms in technology sharing alliances with Japanese firms (e.g., Pucik, 1988;Reich & Mankin, 1986;Teramoto, Richter, & Iwasaki, 1993). Other research has considered the dangers of outsourcing and manufacturing-based alliances in leading to knowledge appropriation (Bettis, Bradley, & Hamel, 1992;Lei & Slocum, 1992).…”
Section: The Other Side Of Learning: Protecting Knowledgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In discussing the potential that multinational corporations have for learning from their diverse operations, Ghoshal (1987: 432) points out that to exploit this potential, 'the organization must consider learning as an explicit objective, and must create mechanisms and systems for such learning to take place'. The outcome of many Japan-West alliances is perceived to be detrimental to Western firms and beneficial to their Japanese partners partly due to the latter's clear intent to acquire specific competencies from the former and the former's lack of such intent (Hamel et al, 1989;Reich and Mankin, 1986;Teramoto, Richter, and Iwasaki, 1993). The deployment of suitable human and supporting resources essential to knowledge acquisition is contingent upon the actual commitment of senior management to the learning agenda.…”
Section: Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning within cross-cultural dimensions was examined in Teramoto, Richter & Iwasaki, (1993). Power accrues to firms with a greater capacity to enhance learning systematically.…”
Section: Leadership Learning and Knowledge Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%