2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2016.7900187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to semantically segment high-resolution remote sensing images

Abstract: Land cover classification is a task that requires methods capable of learning high-level features while dealing with high volume of data. Overcoming these challenges, Convolutional Networks (ConvNets) can learn specific and adaptable features depending on the data while, at the same time, learn classifiers. In this work, we propose a novel technique to automatically perform pixel-wise land cover classification. To the best of our knowledge, there is no other work in the literature that perform pixel-wise seman… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, for these two datasets, we considered as baselines: (i) Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN) [17]. In this case, the pixelwise architectures proposed by [41] were converted into fully convolutional network and exploited as baseline. (ii) Deconvolutional networks [18], [19].…”
Section: B Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, for these two datasets, we considered as baselines: (i) Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN) [17]. In this case, the pixelwise architectures proposed by [41] were converted into fully convolutional network and exploited as baseline. (ii) Deconvolutional networks [18], [19].…”
Section: B Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Coffee [41] and the GRSS Data Fusion [42] datasets, we employed the same protocol of [41]. Specifically, for the former dataset, we conducted a five-fold cross-validation to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on CNNs, many patch-classification methods are proposed to perform semantic labeling (Mnih, 2013;Mostajabi et al, 2015;Paisitkriangkrai et al, 2016;Nogueira et al, 2016;Alshehhi et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017). These methods determine a pixel's label by using CNNs to classify a small patch around the target pixel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of resizing the input data would not only cause the loss of information but would also make it difficult to obtain a direct pixel-to-pixel classification result. For the traditional CNN, we obtained one result for one patch [36], which represented the classification result for one pixel surrounded by that patch, rather than a result at the same size as the patch and each location represented the type of corresponding pixel in the input panchromatic data. Therefore, we revised our residual net in the main line and placed feature maps from the convolution layers directly to the classifier, instead of flatting the feature maps into 1-D structures in advance.…”
Section: Main Linementioning
confidence: 99%