2018
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to read in Chinese: Evidence for reciprocal relationships between word reading and oral language skills

Abstract: This study investigates the longitudinal predictors of the development of Chinese word reading skills and potential bidirectional relationships between Chinese word reading and oral language skills. We examine, in a 2-year longitudinal study, a wide range of theoretically important predictors (phonological awareness, tone awareness, morphological awareness, visual skills, rapid automatized naming, Pinyin knowledge, and vocabulary knowledge) of reading in 143 primary-school children living in mainland China. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(101 reference statements)
3
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely assumed that character recognition involves the processing of orthographical and phonological information (Hulme et al, 2019). In reading activities, establishing a firm association between visual and verbal representations of the character is meaningful for recognition and comprehension (Jin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely assumed that character recognition involves the processing of orthographical and phonological information (Hulme et al, 2019). In reading activities, establishing a firm association between visual and verbal representations of the character is meaningful for recognition and comprehension (Jin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar task was used in a previous study. [ 17 , 18 ] Materials in the task were adapted from textbooks used in primary schools from first to ninth grade. In each trial, a sentence missing one word was presented in the middle of the computer screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torppa et al, 2016)), as well as in languages that use non-alphabetic writing systems (Chinese (e.g. Hulme, Zhou, Tong, Lervåg, & Burgoyne, 2019;Joshi et al, 2012)) However, despite the longstanding influence of the Simple View, the idea that the bipartite effects of decoding and language comprehension can explain reading comprehension is 6 considered as overly-simplistic by some (Francis, Kulesz, & Benoit, 2018). A primary area of debate regards the use of these two terms; what they encapsulate and the best way to accurately measure them.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%