Learning to Quantify Positive Futures

Abstract

the evah institute, a Division of ecquate Pty ltd, australia 2 vlieglCa, spain abstraCt this paper highlights the urgent need to increase the understanding and uptake of positive messaging, metrics and analysis to facilitate learning across all areas of community and professional environmental education. it examines the failures of current environmental sustainability reporting, communication and learning frameworks to inspire and engage people. it then shows the quantification of 'unsustainability' inherent in the development of world-first automated whole-building life Cycle assessment and life Cycle impact assessment (lCia) software. by focussing on a negative range that stops at zero, lCia excludes positive gains in security of supply, climate, habitat and wellness. through case studies, the authors show how practitioners sought to improve sustainability education. they also sought to measure positive gains by developing life Cycle benefit analysis (lCba) compiled to quantify positive development gains within planetary boundaries' safe operating space. lCba was tested in third-party-certified environmental Product Declarations and building projects. Case studies compare benefit and damage metrics for supply, climate, habitat and wellness outcomes, carbon drawdown ratings and circularity scores. the authors report what consultants, teachers, interns and clients learnt about gaps in environmental education frameworks in other institutions. they reflect on how to expand positive sustainability messaging and learning across industry, community and education from primary to post-graduate and professional accreditation. of vital significance is the need to address youth and student anger and apathy in response to the locked-in devastating climate change and wildlife extinctions they have inherited. the authors assert the critical need to engage people of all generations in counting benefits and gains and offer positive sustainability development strategies to this end. among the recommendations is the need for positive climate and habitat security narratives to activate interest, empower responses and motivate teaching and learning.

Quantifying Nature Positive

“…Over 300,000 companies worldwide use UN Environmental Economic Accounting System (UNSEEA) frameworks and International Standards Organisation (ISO) ISO 14044 methods to assess their systems. Overarching UNSEEA reference frames cover benefits from direct use of environmental inputs but exclude indirect benefits from ecosystem services such as carbon, water and biomass storage [35]. UNSEEA and ISO environmental management system frameworks for LCA, LCI, LCIA and EPD cover borrowings of natural capital, costs to nature and damages to supply, habitat and health [34,35].…”

“…Overarching UNSEEA reference frames cover benefits from direct use of environmental inputs but exclude indirect benefits from ecosystem services such as carbon, water and biomass storage [35]. UNSEEA and ISO environmental management system frameworks for LCA, LCI, LCIA and EPD cover borrowings of natural capital, costs to nature and damages to supply, habitat and health [34,35].…”

“…In 1993 the promise of a Green Games and world-first public building LCA helped Sydney win the 2000 Olympics bid. Guided by Dr Ian Boustead and Dr Chet Chaffee from overseas seven New South Wales (NSW) scientists including one of the authors compiled Australia's first national LCI [35]. They modelled Stadium Australia's product supply chain cradle-to-grave.…”

“…They modelled Stadium Australia's product supply chain cradle-to-grave. The Games LCA legacies include environment planning laws, the BASIX building sustainability index, LCIA software and a free OzLCI database [35].…”

“…EPDs enable greener environmental choices by owners, designers and specifiers [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Using ISO14025, ISO21930 and EN15804 standards compliant LCA methods, EPDs show LCIA of lost human and ecosystem health and natural resource access [34].…”