2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Produce Syllabic Speech Sounds via Reward-Modulated Neural Plasticity

Abstract: At around 7 months of age, human infants begin to reliably produce well-formed syllables containing both consonants and vowels, a behavior called canonical babbling. Over subsequent months, the frequency of canonical babbling continues to increase. How the infant’s nervous system supports the acquisition of this ability is unknown. Here we present a computational model that combines a spiking neural network, reinforcement-modulated spike-timing-dependent plasticity, and a human-like vocal tract to simulate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm was developed and tested on adult speech data. One of us has previously applied it to analyze synthesized vocalizations [26]. It was unknown how the method would perform at identifying syllabic nuclei in infant vocalizations.…”
Section: De Jong and Wempe Syllable Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm was developed and tested on adult speech data. One of us has previously applied it to analyze synthesized vocalizations [26]. It was unknown how the method would perform at identifying syllabic nuclei in infant vocalizations.…”
Section: De Jong and Wempe Syllable Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants also show facilitated learning of word‐object associations when, after babbling at an object (object‐directed vocalizations: ODVs), adults immediately label that object (Goldstein, Schwade, Briesch, & Syal, ). Further, recent work using computational modeling has revealed evidence of neural mechanisms (e.g., spike‐timing dependent plasticity) that could underlie changes in vocalizations as a result of contingent feedback (e.g., Takahashi et al., ; Takahaski, Liao, & Ghanzafar, ; Warlaumont & Finnegan, ). Not all forms of caregiver responsiveness, however, have a positive effect on infant learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motorskill learning is influenced by reward (e.g., Buitrago, Ringer, Schulz, Dichgans, & Luft, 2004; Izawa & Shadmehr, 2011), so it is plausible that contingent social responses positively reinforce children both with and without ASD as they develop motor speech skills. Supporting this possibility, several computational models have shown how speech learning can be viewed as a type of motor learning that is influenced by reward (Howard & Messum, 2014; Miura, Yoshikawa, & Asada, 2012; Warlaumont & Finnegan, 2016; Warlaumont, Westermann, Buder, & Oller, 2013). …”
Section: Motor Ability Communicative Motivation and The Social-feedmentioning
confidence: 99%