2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.04027
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Predict Vehicle Trajectories with Model-based Planning

Abstract: HD Map ℳ Reachable Paths 𝒫Feasible Trajectories 𝓣 Modeling Agent-map Interactions Predicted Trajectories 𝓣 𝒕𝒂𝒓 ⊂ 𝓣 Fig. 1. Illustration of our proposed PRIME framework. PRIME has two stages for trajectory prediction in traffic scenarios: the model-based generator (left) which samples the target's feasible future trajectories T by taking its real-time state s 0 tar and the map M, while explicitly imposing kinematical and environmental constraints to guarantee trajectory feasibility; the learning-based ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting observation is that methods performing very well on minFDE 6 such as LaneGCN [14] and TPCN [31] have a worse MR 6 as drawback. PRIME [28] has the closest MR 6 to ours but a much higher minFDE 6 in comparison. We show the results of both our sampling optimized for MR and minFDE with the same trained model.…”
Section: B Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another interesting observation is that methods performing very well on minFDE 6 such as LaneGCN [14] and TPCN [31] have a worse MR 6 as drawback. PRIME [28] has the closest MR 6 to ours but a much higher minFDE 6 in comparison. We show the results of both our sampling optimized for MR and minFDE with the same trained model.…”
Section: B Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Another family of methods use a pool of anchor trajectories, predefined [4] or model-based [23,28], and rank them with a learned model. This allows to avoid any mode collapse and assert realistic trajectories, but removes the ability to tune the trajectories accurately to the current situation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anchor trajectories can also be regarded as a set of driving modes. MultiPath [6] clusters a set of anchors using offline data, while CoverNet [8] and PRIME [22] generate the candidate trajectory set according to the target's state and driving context in an online fashion. Goal-driven methods have also gained popularity in recent years.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they use the same extracted feature vector to output multiple trajectories, which is not intuitive and lacks interpretability on the outputs. Anchor-based methods [14], [15], [16] can provide better interpretability, feasibility, and diversity on the results, but their predictions are restricted to a predefined set, obtained by clustering from the data or generated by a model, which may impede the prediction accuracy. On the other hand, goal-based [4] or proposal-based methods [17], [18], [19] have been widely used due to their superior accuracy and interpretability.…”
Section: B Multi-modal Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%