2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/case48305.2020.9216788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Predict Friction and Classify Contact States by Tactile Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large variety of tactile sensors have been developed in industry and literature, typically trading between resolution, affordability and sensitivity, image-based 3 [24] and magneticbased [39] sensors. Video prediction models have been applied to tactile image prediction using image-based tactile sensors [24,38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A large variety of tactile sensors have been developed in industry and literature, typically trading between resolution, affordability and sensitivity, image-based 3 [24] and magneticbased [39] sensors. Video prediction models have been applied to tactile image prediction using image-based tactile sensors [24,38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we chose to use the Xela uSkin magnetic based tactile sensor due to its low comparative cost, its high frequency readings which are essential for control and the extra challenge of analysing non-calibrated Xela readings (absolute value of the Xela sensor readings depends on the contact force and contact geometry). Zhou et al [39] converted the Xela uSkin tactile sensor readings to a visual representation that could be applied to the CDNA architecture. However, there are significant issues with the proposed representation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in [18], discrete pressure maps provided by tactile sensors were employed to predict grasp stability. In contrast, the solution proposed in [19] leveraged a vision-based tactile sensor and the properties of recurrent neural networks to predict the variation trend of the frictional force at the moment of contact, and classify the contact state. Data-driven methods generally provide computationally efficient inference, which may be critical for detecting slippage in time, and overcome the need to model contact.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches are very sensitive to training data, which are still hard to collect consistently. In fact, to date, the most common way of labeling slip data is by doing it manually (sometimes referred as "expert labeling" [20], [19]), relying on human intuition. This process is generally time-consuming for large datasets and often results in imprecise labels, due to errors introduced by the operator.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%