1982
DOI: 10.1080/0033039820190303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Learn. Suggestions for the Development of a Curriculum at the High School Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sharing of study skills, and alternative ways of explaining the subject material was by far and away the most common process (40% of the total) deployed during mentoring interviews; It became apparent that the students lacked detailed knowledge of strategies for learning or understanding, and felt that they benefitted from practical suggestions on what to do. This deficit in the students' ability to select spontaneously cognitive strategies suggests a possible source of significant underachievement in Chemistry and a potential role for mentoring in developing students' capacity to do this in a subject-specific context (Brien and Goulet, 1982). However, this study did not provide conclusive evidence that it is a deficiency in this area that caused the observed exam underachievement, nor did it exclude other potential contributory factors.…”
Section: Findings 1 a Widespread Need For Further Support With Study ...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The sharing of study skills, and alternative ways of explaining the subject material was by far and away the most common process (40% of the total) deployed during mentoring interviews; It became apparent that the students lacked detailed knowledge of strategies for learning or understanding, and felt that they benefitted from practical suggestions on what to do. This deficit in the students' ability to select spontaneously cognitive strategies suggests a possible source of significant underachievement in Chemistry and a potential role for mentoring in developing students' capacity to do this in a subject-specific context (Brien and Goulet, 1982). However, this study did not provide conclusive evidence that it is a deficiency in this area that caused the observed exam underachievement, nor did it exclude other potential contributory factors.…”
Section: Findings 1 a Widespread Need For Further Support With Study ...mentioning
confidence: 69%