2009
DOI: 10.1080/13674580802532654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to lead: development for middle‐level leaders in higher education in England and Wales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data suggests, however, that neither of these scenarios were the case. These findings concur with previous research investigating academic management role socialisation (Deem 2000;Eley 1994;Inman 2009;Johnson 2002) and point to the fact that while UK Universities appear to be giving increasing consideration to caring for their student body, especially in the context of rapidly rising student fees following the Browne Report (Browne 2010), this is far from the case for academics who are asked to take on middle management roles in the case study institutions. Indeed, the data here appears to reflect a "culture of institutional neglect" from both institutions -whether traditional or modern in history, and research led or teaching led in nature -a term which has recently been used in relation to narratives of doctoral students' experiencing difficulty with their supervision process (McAlpine et al 2012, p. 521).…”
Section: Training and Role Preparation: A Culture Of Institutional Nesupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The data suggests, however, that neither of these scenarios were the case. These findings concur with previous research investigating academic management role socialisation (Deem 2000;Eley 1994;Inman 2009;Johnson 2002) and point to the fact that while UK Universities appear to be giving increasing consideration to caring for their student body, especially in the context of rapidly rising student fees following the Browne Report (Browne 2010), this is far from the case for academics who are asked to take on middle management roles in the case study institutions. Indeed, the data here appears to reflect a "culture of institutional neglect" from both institutions -whether traditional or modern in history, and research led or teaching led in nature -a term which has recently been used in relation to narratives of doctoral students' experiencing difficulty with their supervision process (McAlpine et al 2012, p. 521).…”
Section: Training and Role Preparation: A Culture Of Institutional Nesupporting
confidence: 44%
“…A common finding in studies of department heads is that incoming heads are often ill-prepared to take on the demands of the position (Lefoe et al, 2007;Inman, 2009). With academic backgrounds that have focused on research and teaching, the shift to leadership and management responsibilities can be daunting for the new department head.…”
Section: Personal Growthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This means that they have to relate 'upwards' to a principal or head, and also 'across' to their teaching colleagues, and this relational positioning can create both opportunities and difficulties for the middle leader (Inman 2009). In this way, their positioning forms part of the practice architectures of their leading practices, particularly in the forms and kinds of relationships they are required and able to develop in the project of educating children.…”
Section: Relational Positioningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This literature is dominated with multiple interpretations as to what a leader does, whom they lead and the variable purposes for leading. Further, this scholarship and research has had a strong focus on the work of principals or the positional heads (Inman 2009). More recently, work on leadership practices in education has been extended to include notions of 'distributed leadership' (Spillane 2006), 'dispersed leadership' (Lingard et al 2003), 'democratic leadership' (Woods 2004) and 'teacher leadership' (Muijs and Harris 2006), where leadership is seen as spread throughout the learning institution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%