2021
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2020.3028365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Compute Ergodic Rate for Multi-Cell Scheduling in Massive MIMO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantitatively measure fairness among UTs, we employ Jain's fairness index represented as [29, 30]: f(R¯)badbreak=()k=1KtottrueR¯k2Ktotk=1KtotR¯k2,$$\begin{equation} f(\bar{{R}})=\frac{{\left(\sum _{k=1}^{K_{{\rm tot}}} \bar{{R}}_{k}\right)}^{2}}{K_{{\rm tot}} \sum _{k=1}^{K_{{\rm tot}}} \bar{{R}}_{k}^{2}}, \end{equation}$$it is bounded between 0 and 1. The value of ffalse(trueR¯false)$f(\bar{{R}})$ from 0 to 1 represents the fairness of UTs from low to high.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantitatively measure fairness among UTs, we employ Jain's fairness index represented as [29, 30]: f(R¯)badbreak=()k=1KtottrueR¯k2Ktotk=1KtotR¯k2,$$\begin{equation} f(\bar{{R}})=\frac{{\left(\sum _{k=1}^{K_{{\rm tot}}} \bar{{R}}_{k}\right)}^{2}}{K_{{\rm tot}} \sum _{k=1}^{K_{{\rm tot}}} \bar{{R}}_{k}^{2}}, \end{equation}$$it is bounded between 0 and 1. The value of ffalse(trueR¯false)$f(\bar{{R}})$ from 0 to 1 represents the fairness of UTs from low to high.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively measure fairness among UTs, we employ Jain's fairness index represented as [29,30]:…”
Section: Analysis Of Fair Scheduling With Aousmentioning
confidence: 99%