1999
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy: Experience, Environment, and Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
541
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 679 publications
(562 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
14
541
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, as cultural distance increased, the amount of US foreign direct investment (FDI) decreased (Li and Guisinger, 1992;Loree and Guisinger, 1995); shareholder wealth in those firms making cross-border acquisitions decreased (Datta and Puia, 1995); foreign venture longevity decreased (Barkema et al, 1996), especially when JVs or acquisitions were considered ; the level of embeddedness and integration between host companies and affiliates decreased (Hakanson and Nobel, 2001); the degree of personal attachment in international cooperative ventures decreased (Luo, 2001a), as did the frequency of expressive ties in organizational networks (Manev and Stevenson, 2001); and the level of CEO role conflict and ambiguity (Gong et al, 2001), international expansion performance (Luo and Peng, 1999), local responsiveness (Luo, 2001b), subsidiary return on assets (Luo and Park, 2001), the payoffs from JV partner buyouts (Reuer, 2001), IJV sales (Luo, 2002), and the likelihood of success of foreign-owned affiliates in the US (Li and Guisinger, 1991) all decreased. Increasing cultural distance from the US was negatively associated with entrepreneurial traits such as internal locus of control, moderate risk-taking, and high energy level at the country level (Thomas and Mueller, 2000).…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as cultural distance increased, the amount of US foreign direct investment (FDI) decreased (Li and Guisinger, 1992;Loree and Guisinger, 1995); shareholder wealth in those firms making cross-border acquisitions decreased (Datta and Puia, 1995); foreign venture longevity decreased (Barkema et al, 1996), especially when JVs or acquisitions were considered ; the level of embeddedness and integration between host companies and affiliates decreased (Hakanson and Nobel, 2001); the degree of personal attachment in international cooperative ventures decreased (Luo, 2001a), as did the frequency of expressive ties in organizational networks (Manev and Stevenson, 2001); and the level of CEO role conflict and ambiguity (Gong et al, 2001), international expansion performance (Luo and Peng, 1999), local responsiveness (Luo, 2001b), subsidiary return on assets (Luo and Park, 2001), the payoffs from JV partner buyouts (Reuer, 2001), IJV sales (Luo, 2002), and the likelihood of success of foreign-owned affiliates in the US (Li and Guisinger, 1991) all decreased. Increasing cultural distance from the US was negatively associated with entrepreneurial traits such as internal locus of control, moderate risk-taking, and high energy level at the country level (Thomas and Mueller, 2000).…”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a firm's domestic experience allows it to develop a set of routines that can shorten the time that new members of foreign operations need to invest in learning their jobs, these routines alone are not likely to be sufficient because differences in culture, infra-structure, and institutions between home and international markets can create unprecedented managerial challenges that require a firm to adapt its routines and even develop new ones (Luo and Peng, 1999;Lord and Ranft, 2000). A firm with greater international experience prior to its entry into a foreign market is likely to have experienced more diverse opportunities that allow it to learn how to deal with local idiosyncratic requirements and how to maintain control and coordination within a network of culturally different and geographically dispersed foreign subsidiaries (Chang and Rosenzweig, 2001;Zahra, Ireland, and Hitt, 2000).…”
Section: International Expansion and The Penrose Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign enterprises in transition economies such as China (Luo & Peng, 1999) represent a prime example of a practical setting in which macro-level developments of societal transformation and globalization affect micro-level practices of internationalization and the management of firms in foreign countries in the midst of major changes (Boisot & Child, 1996;Tsui, Schoonhoven, Meyer, Lau, & Milkovich, 2004). Managers are bound to feel more vulnerable in such contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%