2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Cluster Faces via Confidence and Connectivity Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A GCN-based detection and segmentation module was proposed to complete the face clustering task. Yang et al [10] used GCN to infer the confidence of nodes and the connectivity of edges to complete clustering. Guo et al [11] fused GCN and long short-term memory (LSTM) to obtain embedded face data based on density and then used traditional algorithms to achieve a good effect.…”
Section: A Face Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A GCN-based detection and segmentation module was proposed to complete the face clustering task. Yang et al [10] used GCN to infer the confidence of nodes and the connectivity of edges to complete clustering. Guo et al [11] fused GCN and long short-term memory (LSTM) to obtain embedded face data based on density and then used traditional algorithms to achieve a good effect.…”
Section: A Face Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawbacks of these algorithms limit their application in face clustering problems with complex distributions of facial representations. To address this constellation of real problems, recent studies have shown that utilizing graph convolutional networks (GCNs) and supervised information [7], [8], [10], [13] can enhance the characteristics of face clustering. GCNs learn cluster patterns rather than completing a cluster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assess the performance on both person clustering and relationship discovery. For person clustering, we evaluate it with two widely used metrics [18,19], namely Identification and F-score. We adopt top-1 identification hit rate, which is to rank the top-1 image from the 100 gallery images and compute the top-1 hit rate.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature extraction is performed by a ResNet-50 and it can be replaced by a lightweight backbone in practice. The complexity of person clustering is similar to the proposal generation procedure of [18] and it has a more efficient alternative [19] for real-world applications. The relationship discovery only adds a little computation compared to person clustering, as the entire graph has been clustered into some large groups in the previous stage.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%