2018
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aae94a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap

Abstract: Short-depth algorithms are crucial for reducing computational error on near-term quantum computers, for which decoherence and gate infidelity remain important issues. Here we present a machine-learning approach for discovering such algorithms. We apply our method to a ubiquitous primitive: computing the overlap rs ( ) Tr between two quantum states ρ and σ. The standard algorithm for this task, known as the Swap Test, is used in many applications such as quantum support vector machines, and, when specialized to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
260
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
260
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, error mitigation techniques will be necessary to make use of NISQ devices. Several promising error mitigation strategies have recently emerged, including zero-noise extrapolation [2], quasi-probability decomposition [2], post-selection [3,4], noise-aware compiling [5], and machine learning for circuit-depth compression [6]. Let us consider two other strategies for error mitigation in what follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, error mitigation techniques will be necessary to make use of NISQ devices. Several promising error mitigation strategies have recently emerged, including zero-noise extrapolation [2], quasi-probability decomposition [2], post-selection [3,4], noise-aware compiling [5], and machine learning for circuit-depth compression [6]. Let us consider two other strategies for error mitigation in what follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might think by looking at eq. (4) that B (e) λmm ′ can be easily calculated by preparing the qubit representations of |Ψ N +1 λ and |Ψ (e) m ≡ a † m |Ψ N gs , between which the inner product is calculated using the SWAP test or its versions [40,44,45] with phase factors. Such an approach is, however, difficult in fact.…”
Section: Circuits For Diagonal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with confidence level bounded by c. The last inequality in equation (15) was obtained using M=1+1/ò2/ ò, and | ( )| ( ) p   F k 2 j -see appendix A. Equations (11) and (15) imply the desired condition of equation (2).…”
Section: Solution To the Qeep From The Tsmentioning
confidence: 99%