Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding students’ learning styles, and modifying teaching styles and material accordingly, is an essential to delivering quality education. Knowing more about the learning styles of physiotherapy learners will assist educators’ planning and delivering of learning activities. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore what is published about physiotherapy learning styles.MethodsAn adapted Arksey and O’Malley framework was applied to undertake this systematic scoping review. Nine electronic databases (CINAHL, BIOMED CENTRAL, Cochrane, Web of Science, PROQUEST, PubMed, OTseeker, Scopus, ERIC) were searched using the keywords: ‘learning styles’ and ‘physiotherapy’. English-language, primary research articles that investigated physiotherapy learners’ learning styles were sought.ResultsOf 396 potentially-relevant articles, 15 were included in this review. The studies mostly reflected undergraduate students (910 undergraduates, 361 postgraduates, 23 professionals), in developed countries. Nine articles used the Kolb’s experiential learning theory (ELT); one study applied Honey and Mumford’s approach; two studies used the Gregorc model of cognition and three studies did not specify an underlying theory. Outcome measures included different versions of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, the visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic questionnaire, Gregorc style delineator, Felder Silverman’s Index of Learning Survey, and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Style Questionnaire.The preferred physiotherapy learning styles, according to the ELT, seem to be Converger (learns “hands-on” and applying previously attained knowledge) and Assimilator (gathers and organises information to make the most sense).ConclusionsBoth physiotherapy learners and physiotherapists have specific learning styles of active participation, underpinned with practical examples of theoretical concepts. More research is needed in developing countries, and on postgraduate and professional physiotherapy learners’ learning styles. Also, further research should focus on defining and describing physiotherapy learning styles in a way to be used as an industry standard; and developing valid and reliable learning style outcome measures applicable across physiotherapy learners and settings.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A qualitative study of the dementia-care experiences and educational needs of physiotherapists in the Republic of Ireland

“…Despite calls for education and training of clinicians who work with patients with dementia [20], reviews have identified that dementia education is limited for medical, nursing and allied healthcare professionals [10]. Our findings indicate that physiotherapists value more informal educational opportunities, learning through active participation with experienced peers in the work-place, a finding supported by literature on the preferred learning styles of physiotherapists [11]. However in order for training and education to be most effective, it is important that active participation with practice-based learning is underpinned by theoretical or knowledge-based content [18].…”

“…Definitive information about undergraduate dementia content in programmes across health and social care has been difficult to ascertain [10]. The design of educational programmes for physiotherapists needs to take their clinical experiences, learning styles and educational needs into consideration [11]. However, there is a paucity of literature on the dementia care educational needs of physiotherapists.…”

Factors influencing clinical practice guideline uptake by South African physiotherapists: A qualitative investigation of barriers and facilitators

“…Professional culture may influence how individuals learn by how they process and utilize information and how effectively a CPG may be implemented in a specific context P2: “… culture eats strategy for breakfast ‐ so the culture of the team is going to determine to a large extent how the team practices and behaves and communicates and collaborates … no one can have all the answers and so using a guideline as a starting point is great …”…”

Twelve Tips for Using Co-creation for Value Creation and Professional Development

“…It is also beneficial to explore the preferred learning/working styles (Nja et al, 2019;Stander, Grimmer and Brink, 2019) and working practices within the group. Who enjoys new experiences?…”