Learning styles and strategies preferences of Iranian medical students in gross anatomy courses and their correlations with gender

Abstract

The learning approaches can help anatomy teachers design a suitable curriculum in harmony with their students' learning styles. The research objective is to evaluate gross anatomy learning styles and strategies preferences of Iranian medical students at Kashan University of Medical Sciences (KAUMS). This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out on 237 Iranian medical students. The students answered questions on approaches to learning anatomy and expressed opinions about learning anatomy in medical curriculum. The data were analyzed to disclose statistically significant differences between male and female students. Iranian male and female students were interested in learning anatomy using notes, plastic models, pictures and diagrams, clinical context, dissection and prosection of cadavers; however, they rarely used cross-sectional images and web-based resources. Both groups of medical students used region and system in learning anatomy. However, there existed some striking differences, particularly in having difficulty in studying anatomy using cadaveric specimens, using books alone, and learning it in small groups. Male students were less interested in learning with cadavers than female counterparts. However, female students were more interested in learning anatomy in small groups. This study suggests that instructors should design gross anatomy curriculum based on limitations of using dissection of cadaver in Iranian universities, emphasis on the applied anatomy, and learning of gross anatomy in small groups.

The use of reflective practice to promote pharmacy students’ metacognition in a foundation anatomy course

“…These approaches change over time to include the recommend course material, online platforms and more structured self-directed learning; thus, evolving to become multi-modal. The use of online resources, however, is less than what the authors expected and corresponds to the findings of others (Atlasi et al, 2017). Genderbased differences were not explored and is a possible limitation of this study.…”

“…The inclusion of the latter is extremely important for educators wishing to shift from a more didactic approach to fostering selfdirected learning amongst students (Lachman and Pawlina, 2006). Furthermore, the ability to characterise students' learning approaches has the potential to enhance the overall educational experience by guiding educators to tailor their teaching approaches and initiate possible remedial interventions (Romanelli et al, 2009;Atlasi et al, 2017). The aim here, through the formal inclusion of reflective practice, is to provide insights to pharmacy students' initial approaches to studying anatomy, promote their metacognition as well as their perceived value of anatomy as a subject.…”

A meta-analysis of students’ readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning

“…It was reported that males and females interact differently in learning situations [ 24 ], and research found that females perform better with collaborative learning [ 25 ]. Atlasi, Moravveji [ 26 ] indicated that female students were more motivated to learn in small groups than male students. Wehrwein, Lujan [ 27 ] reported that only 4.2% of male students preferred learning by reading printed texts and writing compared to other modes of instruction.…”

The impacts of three-dimensional anatomical atlas on learning anatomy

“…A majority of the residency programs report that gross anatomy is either extremely important or very important to mastery of their discipline and rank it as the most important basic science [1]. The ability to conceptualize and visualize the structure in three-dimensional (3D) space, which is developed in the gross anatomy curriculum, is also important in the clinical setting when operating or performing invasive medical tests [2]. Traditional learning methods in gross anatomy are lecture-based learning, problem-based learning, and dissection [34].…”