Learning styles: a cross‐sectional and longitudinal study in higher education

Abstract

Background. In his dissertation, Jan Vermunt (1992) proposed four different learning styles: a meaning directed, a reproduction directed, an application directed and an undirected style.Aims. In a cross‐sectional and longitudinal design the development of these learning styles during students' stay at the university is studied, as well as the relation of these styles with academic success. A systematic relation between year of study and learning style is expected, namely that the application and meaning directed learning style scores would be higher in the later years and the undirected and reproduction learning style scores would be the highest in the early years.Results. In the cross‐sectional study it was not found that the application and meaning directed learning style scores were higher in the later years, nor that the undirected and reproduction learning style scores were the highest in the early years. In the longitudinal study the means of the meaning directed and application directed learning style scores indeed increased over the years, while the means of the reproduction and undirected learning style scores decreased. For the score on the meaning directed learning style, this change was significant, though a marginal effect size was found.Conclusion. It might not be concluded there is a systematic relation between year of study and learning style. No evidence is found for the implicit hierarchy that the meaning directed and application directed learning are better than the reproduction learning style. The undirected learning style, however, correlates negatively with academic success.

Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students

“…The results are also consistent with evidence in accounting (Gow et al, 1994) and other disciplines (Busato et al, 1998;Zeegers, 2001) that students' approaches to learning do change over time. However, unlike previous research that has examined changes in students' learning approaches in the 'normal' university learning environment, this study reports evidence on changes in students' learning approaches surrounding specific changes in the learning environment designed to encourage deep approaches to learning.…”

Goals, Efficacy and Metacognitive Self-Regulation A Path Analysis

“…These proposed effects are perhaps reflected in the correlation between achievement goal measures and measures of students' achievement. ISSN 1948-5476 2010 A relationship between learning strategies and academic performance has been found in several studies (Busato, Prins, Elshout, & Harnamaker, 1998;Entwitle, 1988;Pintrich & Schrauben, 1992;Weinstein & Mayer, 1986;Vermunt, 1998). Typically, high achievement has been positively related to deep learning strategies and negatively related to surface learning strategies.…”

Pharmacy Students' Approaches to Learning in Undergraduate and Graduate Entry Programs

“…While 2 studies of university students' progression through their degree programs found increases in deep-processing strategies and self-regulated learning behaviors, another investigation of university students showed no improvements in productive approaches over time. [17][18][19] Hastings et al's study of pharmacy students' motivation over the course of their degree revealed significant decreases in their desire to develop mastery and deep understanding of course material. 20 Similarly, Sansgiry found that the quality of pharmacy students' study strategies decreased over the 3 years of the degree program.…”