The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &Amp; Data Mining 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3219819.3220025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Structural Node Embeddings via Diffusion Wavelets

Abstract: Nodes residing in different parts of a graph can have similar structural roles within their local network topology. The identification of such roles provides key insight into the organization of networks and can be used for a variety of machine learning tasks. However, learning structural representations of nodes is a challenging problem, and it has typically involved manually specifying and tailoring topological features for each node. In this paper, we develop GraphWave, a method that represents each node's … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
302
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
302
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeepWalk [6], Node2vec [8] and LINE [7] are state-of-the-art random walk based models that use uniform, BFS/DFS like random walks and first/second order distance for this purpose, respectively. Examples of other static node embedding methods are proposed in [18], [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeepWalk [6], Node2vec [8] and LINE [7] are state-of-the-art random walk based models that use uniform, BFS/DFS like random walks and first/second order distance for this purpose, respectively. Examples of other static node embedding methods are proposed in [18], [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches [14], [15] have been proposed to fill this gap in recent years. Despite their success, these methods do not make full use of existing network embedding approaches, making them either rely heavily on heuristic feature engineering or suffer from high computation and space cost, thus hard to generalize across graphs and scale to massive networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our proposed methods with state-of-the-art baselines [11], [14], [15] on several real-world datasets. Firstly, we illustratively demonstrate the difference between typical network embededing and structural embedding on an expressway network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, motivated by the diffusion wavelet transform [14]- [18] and convolutional neural networks [19] on graphs that all use Chebyshev polynomials, we propose a new spectral method to solve the heat diffusion by approximating the heat kernel by orthogonal polynomials. The previous works did the spectral decomposition on mostly graph Laplacian exclusively using Chebyshev polynomials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method is faster than the LB-eigenfunction approach and FEM based diffusion solvers [9]. We further applied the fast polynomial approximation method to iterative convolution to obtain multiscale features, which is shown to be as good as the diffusion wavelet in detecting localized surface signals [14]- [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%