Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1989323.1989451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning statistical models from relational data

Abstract: Statistical Relational Learning (SRL) is a subarea of machine learning which combines elements from statistical and probabilistic modeling with languages which support structured data representations. In this survey, we will: 1) provide an introduction to SRL, 2) describe some of the distinguishing characteristics of SRL systems, including relational feature construction and collective classification, 3) describe three SRL systems in detail, 4) discuss applications of SRL techniques to important data managemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the Statistical Relational Models (SRMs) of Getoor, Taskar and Koller [8], are the only prior statistical models with a class-level probability semantics. A direct empirical comparison is di cult as code has not been released, but SRMs have compared favorably with benchmark methods for estimating the cardinality of a database query result [2] (Sec.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge, the Statistical Relational Models (SRMs) of Getoor, Taskar and Koller [8], are the only prior statistical models with a class-level probability semantics. A direct empirical comparison is di cult as code has not been released, but SRMs have compared favorably with benchmark methods for estimating the cardinality of a database query result [2] (Sec.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) SRMs are derived from a tuple semantics [8,Def.6.3], which is different from the random selection semantics we propose for FBNs. (2) SRMs are less expressive: The queries that can be formulated using the nodes in an SRM cannot express general combinations of positive and negative relationships [8,Def.6.6]. This restriction stems from the fact that the SRM semantics is based on randomly selecting tuples from existing tables in the database.…”
Section: Related Work and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One proposal [6] is designed with only selection queries in mind, and another [13] supports only key-foreign key joins. However, it is not hard to extend the notion of statistical relational models described in [12] to work correctly with arbitrary joins. The downside is that all possible joins must be known prior to building the statistical model.…”
Section: Estimation Of Joint Selectivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See, for example, [3], [4], [9].) These collective classification techniques typically outperform classifiers that use only propositional data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%